CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 10 juillet 2017

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA6BC7FA7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:right } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic }   Communicated on 10 July 2017   SECOND SECTION Application no. 59527/15 Sergiu HODOROGEA against the Republic of Moldova lodged on 27 November 2015 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the applicant’s detention in pre-trial detention for one year and eleven months. He complains under Article 5 of the Convention that his detention was not lawful under domestic law, because it was too long. Since the applicant’s detention was longer than twelve months, the case raises issues which are similar to those examined in Savca v. the Republic of Moldova , no. 17963/08, 15 March 2016. The case also raises issues under Article 3 of the Convention in view of the applicant’s allegations concerning the poor conditions of detention in Prison   no. 13. The applicant raises other complaints under Article 5 §§ 3 and 4 and under Article 13 of the Convention. QUESTIONS tO THE PARTIES 1.     Did the material conditions of the applicant’s detention in Prison   no.   13 amount to inhuman or degrading treatment?   2.     Was the applicant’s pre-trial detention in breach of Article 5 § 1 of the Convention (see Savca v. the Republic of Moldova , no. 17963/08, 15 March 2016)?