CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 18 mai 2016

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA6BC7FA7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:right } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase }   Communicated on 18 May 2016   FOURTH SECTION Application no. 9114/16 Patrick ROYER against Hungary lodged on 11 February 2016 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the abduction of a child by one of his parents and the non-execution of the judicial decisions ordering his return. In this application the Hungarian authorities applied Article   13   (b) of the Hague Convention and concluded to the existence of a grave risk that the child’s return would expose him to psychological harm and place him in an intolerable situation if returned to his father in France. The applicant submitted his complaints relying on Article 8.   QUESTION tO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for family life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention? In particular, have the authorities observed their positive obligations under Article 8 to ensure that the applicant could properly exercise the right of access to his child?