CEDHCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 31 août 2017
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:001-177163
- Date
- 31 août 2017
- Publication
- 31 août 2017
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleCommunicated
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA6BC7FA7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:right } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .sADADF4A7 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s23860FF7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:center }   Communicated on 31 August 2017   FIRST SECTION Applications nos 53195/16 and 60130/16 Milovan IGNJATIĆ against Croatia and Dragutin URH against Croatia lodged on 5 September 2016 and 11 October 2016 respectively SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASES The applications concern the applicants’ complaints under Article   4 of Protocol No.   7 to the Convention of the alleged breach of the ne bis in idem principle on the grounds that they were each tried or punished twice for the same offence, first in minor offences proceedings and subsequently in criminal proceedings. The applicant in the first case (no.   53195/16) was acquitted in the minor offences proceedings for acting contrary to the Fire Protection Act concerning a fire incident on fishing boat “Gira”. The judgment at issue was given on 20   April 2009. On 22   September 2011, in the criminal proceedings, he was convicted of serious criminal offence against public safety related to the same incident. The criminal conviction became final on 18   July 2012. The applicant in the second case (no.   60130/16) was convicted in the minor offences proceedings for minor offence against public peace and order concerning an incident which occurred on 21   April 2011. The conviction of 26   August 2011 became final on 23   February 2012. He was later convicted in the criminal proceedings for causing bodily injury related to the same incident. The conviction of 1   October 2014 became final on 26   March 2014.     QUESTION tO THE PARTIES [in each case]   Was the applicant tried or punished twice for the same offence, contrary to Article   4 §   1 of Protocol No.   7?Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
- Date
- 31 août 2017
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:001-177163
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral
- Résumé officiel