CEDHCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 30 août 2017
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:001-177238
- Date
- 30 août 2017
- Publication
- 30 août 2017
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleCommunicated
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA6BC7FA7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:right } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s75A32C27 { border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s8F670191 { font-family:Arial; font-size:12pt; list-style-position:inside }   Communicated on 30 August 2017   THIRD SECTION Applications nos. 50164/15 and 61061/15 Ivan Ildusovich ZALYAMUTDINOV against Russia and Andrey Alekseyevich KOSTYLEV against Russia lodged on 23 September 2015 and 28 November 2015 respectively SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASES The applications concern the applicants’ confinement in a metal cage in the courtroom before the Metallurgicheskiy District Court of Chelyabinsk allegedly in breach of Articles   3 and 6 §§   1 and 3 (b) and (c) of the Convention, and the absence of an effective domestic remedy for the above complaints contrary to the requirements of Article   13 of the Convention. QUESTIONS tO THE PARTIES 1.     Have the applicants been subjected to degrading treatment, in breach of Article   3 of the Convention, on account of their confinement in a metal cage in the courtroom during the proceedings before the Metallurgicheskiy District Court of Chelyabinsk (see Svinarenko and Slyadnev v.   Russia [GC], nos.   32541/08 and 43441/08, §§   113 ‑ 39, ECHR 2014 (extracts), and Vorontsov and Others v.   Russia , nos.   59655/14 and 2   others, §   31, 31   January 2017)?   2.     Did the applicants’ confinement in the metal cage in the courtroom entail a failure to respect the fair hearing guarantees under Article   6 of the Convention? In particular:   a)     Were the applicants afforded adequate facilities to prepare their defence, as required by Article   6 §   3   (b) of the Convention? What were the furnishings of the metal cage in the courtroom? Were the applicants provided with a desk like other parties to the proceedings? Were they afforded adequate facilities to take notes during the trial?     b)     Were the applicants afforded an opportunity to enjoy effective legal assistance in the courtroom, as required by Article   6 §   3   (c) of the Convention? Were the applicants able to have confidential exchanges with their lawyers, both oral and written, during the hearings (see Khodorkovskiy and Lebedev v. Russia , nos.   11082/06 and 13772/05, §§   642-48, 25   July 2013; Urazov v. Russia , no.   42147/05, §§   85-90, 14   June 2016; and Yaroslav Belousov v. Russia , nos.   2653/13 and 60980/14, §   147, 4   October 2016)?   3.     Did the applicants have at their disposal an effective domestic remedy for their complaints under Articles   3 and 6 of the Convention regarding their confinement in the metal cage in the courtroom, as required by Article   13 of the Convention (see Svinarenko and Slyadnev , cited above, §   87, and Yaroslav Belousov v. Russia , nos. 2653/13 and 60980/14, §§   113 and 141, 4   October 2016)?   appendix No. Application no. Lodged on Applicant Date of birth Place of residence Represented by   50164/15 23/09/2015 Ivan Ildusovich ZALYAMUTDINOV 12/04/1988 Sterlitamak Alla Igorevna DUNAYEVA   61061/15 28/11/2015 Andrey Alekseyevich KOSTYLEV 14/03/1974 Sterlitamak Alla Igorevna DUNAYEVA    Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
- Date
- 30 août 2017
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:001-177238
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral
- Résumé officiel