CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 8 septembre 2017

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA6BC7FA7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:right } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase }   Communicated on 8 September 2017   THIRD SECTION Application no. 50553/17 C.D. against Switzerland lodged on 8 July 2017 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the expulsion of the applicant to the Philippines following his conviction to a prison sentence for aggravated drug trafficking. Referring to the “war on drugs”, he claims that he risks the death penalty, extralegal killing and a flagrant denial of justice if returned to the Philippines.   QUESTIONS tO THE PARTIES   1.     Would the applicant’s right to life, ensured by Article   2 of the Convention, be violated in case the expulsion order was implemented?   2.     Would the implementation of the expulsion order give rise to a violation of Article   3 of the Convention?   3.     Has there been a violation of the procedural obligations under Article   2 and/or Article   3 due to the lack of formal decision concerning the allegations raised by the applicant?