CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG — 21 septembre 2017

.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .sCF71F55 { width:100%; border-collapse:collapse } .s829ABBD9 { border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-top:11.35pt; padding-bottom:10.98pt; vertical-align:middle } .s598389FB { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:14pt } .sDB9EB187 { font-weight:bold } .s3CC4D07E { font-size:12pt; font-weight:bold } .s598389F8 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:11pt } .sFBC99493 { font-style:italic } .s2D33099A { font-size:7.33pt; font-style:italic; vertical-align:super } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s831CE78A { height:14.5pt } .sBB1804B6 { width:18.68%; border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s2EB42ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:10pt } .s161F193C { font-size:9pt; font-weight:bold } .s5FFF0A7F { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:9pt } .sA84F0CBD { width:22.08%; border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s7A52B8A8 { width:31.04%; border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s383A564E { width:28.2%; border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt 1pt 0.75pt 0.75pt; padding-right:4.9pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s5FFF0A7E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:8pt } .s22F01CEB { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-18pt } .s37D58556 { width:14.67pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s876D4AB2 { text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } .sA8507A40 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:35.4pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s1A61A404 { margin-top:6pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-indent:35.4pt; text-align:justify } Resolution CM/ResDH(2017)295 Execution of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights Eight cases against Ukraine   (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 21 September 2017 at the 1294 th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies)     Application   Case Judgment of Final on 33579/04 BOROTYUK 16/12/2010 16/03/2011 39582/04 BORTNIK 27/01/2011 27/04/2011 16717/05 TODOROV 12/01/2012 12/04/2012 19157/06 KHAYROV 15/11/2012 15/02/2013 12167/04 YEROKHINA 15/11/2012 15/02/2013 65032/09 A.V. 29/01/2015 29/04/2015 17969/09 TIKHONOV 10/12/2015 10/03/2016 2308/06 SARANCHOV 09/06/2016 09/09/2016   The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”),   Having regard to the final judgments transmitted by the Court to the Committee in these cases and to the violations established;   Recalling the respondent State’s obligation, under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention, to abide by all final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and that this obligation entails, over and above the payment of any sums awarded by the Court, the adoption by the authorities of the respondent State, where required:   -           of individual measures to put an end to violations established and erase their consequences so as to achieve as far as possible restitutio in integrum ; and -           of general measures preventing similar violations;   Having invited the government of the respondent State to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with the above-mentioned obligation;   Having examined the information by the government indicating the measures adopted in order to give effect to the judgments including the information provided regarding the payment of the just satisfaction awarded by the Court (see document DH-DD(2017)720 );   Having noted further that none of the applicants in these cases has applied for re-opening of the impugned proceedings;   Having noted that, in respect of the general measures adopted, progress has been made, in particular through the adoption of the new 2012 Code of Criminal Procedure; and that the outstanding questions related to the impact of the general measures will remain under the supervision of the Committee in the context of the Balitskiy group of cases;   DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in these cases and   DECIDES to close the examination thereof.