CEDHCASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG17
CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG — 21 septembre 2017
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:001-177649
- Date
- 21 septembre 2017
- Publication
- 21 septembre 2017
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleInformation given by the government concerning measures taken to prevent new violations. Payment of the sums provided for in the judgment
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .sCF71F55 { width:100%; border-collapse:collapse } .s829ABBD9 { border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-top:11.35pt; padding-bottom:10.98pt; vertical-align:middle } .s598389FB { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:14pt } .sDB9EB187 { font-weight:bold } .s3CC4D07E { font-size:12pt; font-weight:bold } .s598389F8 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:11pt } .sFBC99493 { font-style:italic } .s2D33099A { font-size:7.33pt; font-style:italic; vertical-align:super } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s22F01CEB { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-18pt } .s37D58556 { width:14.67pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s876D4AB2 { text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } .sA8507A40 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:35.4pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s1A61A404 { margin-top:6pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-indent:35.4pt; text-align:justify } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sC171EB59 { font-weight:bold; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } .s8B7E65F0 { width:100%; margin-right:9pt; margin-left:9pt; border-collapse:collapse; float:right } .sA287A76F { width:18.4%; border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s5FFF0A7F { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:9pt } .sB5CD40E6 { width:33.6%; border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s9F9A7D70 { width:21.86%; border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s125C2C25 { width:26.14%; border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt 1pt 0.75pt 0.75pt; padding-right:4.9pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s9AF62556 { height:2.35pt } Resolution CM/ResDH(2017)296 Execution of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights 36 cases against Ukraine (see Appendix for the list of cases)   (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 21 September 2017 at the 1294 th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies)     The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”),   Having regard to the final judgments transmitted by the Court to the Committee in these cases and to the violations established;   Recalling the respondent State’s obligation, under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention, to abide by all final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and that this obligation entails, over and above the payment of any sums awarded by the Court, the adoption by the authorities of the respondent State, where required:   -           of individual measures to put an end to violations established and erase their consequences so as to achieve as far as possible restitutio in integrum ; and -           of general measures preventing similar violations;   Having invited the government of the respondent State to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with the above-mentioned obligation;   Having examined the information by the government indicating the measures adopted to give effect to the judgments including the information provided regarding the payment of the just satisfaction awarded by the Court (see document DH-DD(2017)712 );   Having noted further that the applicants are no longer in detention on remand and that the facts in these cases occurred before the entry into force of the new Code of Criminal Procedure in November 2012; and that that, where required, all individual measures were taken in response to the other violations established by the Court in some of these cases;   Having noted that, in respect of the general measures, certain progress has been achieved in response to the Court’s judgments to resolve the issues related to detention on remand, in particular through the recent judicial reform and the adoption of the 2012 Code of Criminal Procedure;   Recalling that the Committee will assess the impact of these measures and will continue to supervise the outstanding questions related to the application of the detention on remand under the new Code of Criminal Procedure in the context of the remaining cases of this group, and in particular the case Ignatov ;   DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in the cases listed below and   DECIDES to close the examination thereof. Appendix to Resolution CM/ResDH(2017) 296 Application   Case Judgment of Final on 40107/02 KHARCHENKO 10/02/2011 10/05/2011 71660/11 BARYSHEVSKYY 26/02/2015 26/02/2015 27889/03 BOLDYREV 20/01/2011 20/01/2011 25725/02 BORISENKO 12/01/2012 12/04/2012 38800/12 BUDAN 14/01/2016 14/01/2016 27672/03 BURYAGA 15/07/2010 15/10/2010 16505/02 DORONIN 19/02/2009 19/05/2009 42813/05 DYACHENKO 18/04/2013 18/04/2013 6759/11 GAL 16/04/2015 16/07/2015 17650/02 GAVAZHUK 18/02/2010 18/05/2010 38717/04 KHAYREDINOV 14/10/2010 14/01/2011 13371/06 KOMAROVA 16/05/2013 16/08/2013 49122/07 KRAVCHENKO 23/02/2012 23/02/2012 16447/04 KUCHERENKO NIKOLAY 19/02/2009 19/05/2009 37645/10 LUTSENKO 05/04/2012 05/04/2012 37198/10 MALYK 29/01/2015 29/04/2015 19805/08 MIROSHNICHENKO 20/10/2011 20/10/2011 34211/04 MIROSHNICHENKO ROMAN 19/02/2009 19/05/2009 2161/02 MOLODORYCH 28/10/2010 28/01/2011 37466/04 MOSKALENKO 20/05/2010 20/08/2010 15816/04 MURUKIN 02/09/2010 02/12/2010 11930/09 OLEYNIKOVA 20/12/2011 20/12/2011 12222/09 ORLOVSKIY 02/04/2015 02/07/2015 4634/04 OSYPENKO 09/11/2010 09/02/2011 74297/11 PODVEZKO 12/02/2015 12/02/2015 5522/04 PROKOPENKO 20/01/2011 20/01/2011 5797/05 RUDENKO 25/11/2010 25/11/2010 5425/11 RUSLAN YAKOVENKO 04/06/2015 04/09/2015 11778/05 SMOLIK 19/01/2012 19/04/2012 40774/02+ SOLOVEY AND ZOZULYA 27/11/2008 27/02/2009 35231/02 SVERSHOV 27/11/2008 27/02/2009 39458/02 TKACHEV 13/12/2007 13/03/2008 16698/05 TRETYAKOV 29/09/2011 29/12/2011 2937/04 VINOKUROV 15/07/2010 15/10/2010 7554/10 VOLYANYK 02/10/2014 02/10/2014 17283/02 YELOYEV 06/11/2008 06/02/2009  Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
- Formation
- 17
- Date
- 21 septembre 2017
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:001-177649
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral