CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 27 septembre 2017

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA6BC7FA7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:right } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt }   Communicated on 27 September 2017   THIRD SECTION Application no. 41462/17 Montserrat LAGUNA GUZMAN against Spain lodged on 29 May 2017 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the use of force by the police in order to disperse a peaceful demonstration which took place without prior authorisation. QUESTIONS tO THE PARTIES 1.     Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to freedom of peaceful assembly, contrary to Article 11 of the Convention (see, by way of comparison, Kudrevicius and Others v. Lithuania , [GC] 15   October 2015, application no. 37553/05)?   2.     In particular, were the measures taken by the police – and endorsed by the Audiencia Provincial of Valladolid – necessary in terms of Article   11 §   2?