CEDHCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 13 novembre 2017
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:001-179389
- Date
- 13 novembre 2017
- Publication
- 13 novembre 2017
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleCommunicated
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA6BC7FA7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:right } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .sA56BACAB { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; list-style-position:inside } .s13783063 { width:6.24pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s3537C2D6 { font-weight:normal } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold }   Communicated on 13 November 2017   THIRD SECTION Application no. 61391/11 NOVAYA GAZETA and Roman Aleksandrovich ANIN against Russia lodged on 16 September 2011 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns civil defamation proceedings brought by the Administrative Directorate of the President of Russia (“Управление делами Президента РФ”) and its head, Mr K., following publication in a national newspaper published by the applicant company of an article penned by the second applicant. The article covered alleged corruption in the course of the renovation works of a State property in Sochi managed by the Directorate. It was based on publications and interviews in other media outlets reporting that a Mr M. had publicly claimed to have given a bribe to a Kremlin official in order to receive a commission for the renovation works, as well as on the second applicant’s interview with Mr M. The article cited technical and financial documents to demonstrate misuse of public funds. The claimants alleged that the applicants and Mr M. had disseminated statements tarnishing, in particular, their business reputation. The domestic courts found for the claimants, ordered a retraction and awarded Mr K. 100,000 Russian roubles (RUB) to be paid by the applicant company, as well as RUB 30,000 to be paid by the second applicant and Mr   M. each in non-pecuniary damages. QUESTIONS tO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicants’ right to freedom of expression guaranteed by Article 10 of the Convention on account of the defamation proceedings brought by the Administrative Directorate of the President of Russia and its head, Mr K.? In particular, did the domestic courts give relevant and sufficient reasons to justify the alleged interference with the applicants’ right to freedom of expression? Did they apply standards which were in conformity with the principles embodied in Article   10 of the Convention? Did they base themselves on an acceptable assessment of the relevant facts (see OOO Izdatelskiy Tsentr Kvartirnyy Ryad v. Russia , no. 39748/05, § 46, 25 April 2017, and Terentyev v. Russia , no. 25147/09, §   24, 26   January 2017)?   APPENDIX       ANO “Redaktsionno-Izdatelskiy Dom ‘Novaya Gazeta’” is a legal entity incorporated under Russian law.       Roman Aleksandrovich ANIN is a Russian national who was born in 1986 and lives in Yaroslavl.  Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
- Date
- 13 novembre 2017
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:001-179389
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral
- Résumé officiel