CEDHCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 29 novembre 2017
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:001-179795
- Date
- 29 novembre 2017
- Publication
- 29 novembre 2017
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleCommunicated
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA6BC7FA7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:right } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s75A32C27 { border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s8F670191 { font-family:Arial; font-size:12pt; list-style-position:inside } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold }   Communicated on 29 November 2017   FOURTH SECTION Application no. 66792/14 Éva VASS against Hungary and 2 other applications (see list appended) SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASES Ms Noé (application no. 66798/14), senior official of a registered left ‑ wing political party, performed propaganda activities in the street on 1   May 2012 while wearing a five-pointed red star. Having learnt that another party activist had been committed to the police for displaying a totalitarian symbol, the applicant demonstrated in front of the police building, claiming the release of the other activist. She was committed to the police station for about five hours and was later prosecuted for the offence of displaying a totalitarian symbol. Although the prosecution was subsequently discontinued, the applicant’s administrative action against the police for unjustified action was dismissed on 12 February 2014 (service: 4   April 2014). Another similar incident occurred on 29 July 2012 when Ms Noé, together with Ms Vass (application no. 66792/14) and Ms Róna (application no.   66889/14), demonstrated, wearing five-pointed red stars, against Government policies. Their cases challenging the ensuing police action were finally dismissed by the Kúria on various dates in February 2014 (service: 4, 9 and 7 April 2014, respectively).   QUESTION tO THE PARTIES Have there been violations of the applicants’ right to freedom of expression and/or right to peaceful assembly, contrary to Article 10 and/or Article 11 of the Convention (see Vajnai v. Hungary , no. 33629/06, ECHR 2008 and Bukta and Others v. Hungary , no. 25691/04, ECHR 2007 ‑ III)?         No. Application no. Lodged on Applicant Date of birth Place of residence Nationality Represented by   66792/14 02/10/2014 Éva VASS 14/04/1964 Budapest Hungarian   György MAGYAR   66798/14 01/10/2014 Krisztina NOÉ 01/07/1970 Paks Hungarian   György MAGYAR   66889/14 02/10/2014 Judit RÓNA 24/04/1952 Budapest Hungarian   György MAGYAR    Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
- Date
- 29 novembre 2017
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:001-179795
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral
- Résumé officiel