CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 20 décembre 2017

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA6BC7FA7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:right } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic }   Communicated on 20 December 2017   SECOND SECTION Application no. 36673/11 FORESTA-FORT S.R.L. against the Republic of Moldova lodged on 30 May 2011 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the enforcement of a final judgment adopted in civil proceedings, more than ten years after its adoption, in circumstances in which the legal time-limit for applying for a final judgment to be enforced was three years. It raises issues similar to those examined by the Court in the case of Dragostea Copiilor - Petrovschi - Nagornii v.   Moldova , no.   25575/08, 13   September 2011. The applicant company, who was defendant in the domestic proceedings, complains under Article   6 §   1 and Article   1 of Protocol No.   1 to the Convention that the principle of legal certainty was breached and that he lost property as a result of that breach. QUESTION tO THE PARTIES Was there a breach of the applicant’s rights under Article   6 §   1 of the Convention and Article   1 of Protocol No.   1 to the Convention, as a result of the upholding by the domestic courts of the request concerning the enforcement of the final judgment of 11   November 1998 ( Dragostea Copiilor - Petrovschi - Nagornii v.   Moldova , no.   25575/08, 13   September 2011)?