CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 14 janvier 2018

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA6BC7FA7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:right } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic }   Communicated on 14 January 2018   FOURTH SECTION Application no. 76969/11 Daniel-Nicu STROEA against Romania lodged on 8 December 2011 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the publication of two allegedly defamatory articles concerning the applicant in a newspaper and the failure to provide damages for the alleged infringement of the applicant’s reputation, as part of the right to respect for private life provided for by Article 8 of the Convention.   QUESTION tO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for his private life, in particular his personal honour and reputation, within the meaning of Article 8 of the Convention, in light of the final decision of 30   January 2015 rendered by the Galaţi County Court (see, for example, Axel Springer AG v.   Germany [GC], no. 39954/08, § 83, 7 February 2012)?