CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 7 février 2018

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s23860FF7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:center } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left }   Communicated on 14 December 2014 and 7 February 2018   FOURTH SECTION Application no. 49089/10 E. B. against Romania lodged on 11 August 2010   The facts and complaints in this application have been summarised in the Court’s Statement of facts and Questions to the parties, which is available in HUDOC. QUESTION Did the authorities take the necessary measures to conduct the proceedings such as to prevent, to the extent reasonably possible, the aggravation of the applicant’s trauma? Was there a violation of the positive obligations inherent in Article 3 and/or Article 8 of the Convention on account of the alleged lack of such measures (see Y. v. Slovenia , no.   4107/10, §§ 101-116, 28 May 2015)?