CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 23 février 2018

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA6BC7FA7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:right } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .sC306B944 { width:108.56%; border-collapse:collapse } .sBCA83E4F { width:10.36%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s598389F7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:10pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s67D5986A { font-family:Arial; font-size:6.67pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#474747 } .s7EE5DD62 { width:22.46%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s14B2DD6B { width:10.34%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sC6E770DA { width:15.5%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s662D558D { width:13.8%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s5F818CD0 { width:27.56%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sF4F7263B { height:25.5pt } .s22BF375B { width:10.36%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s43B4C4A0 { margin-left:31.34pt; text-align:center; padding-left:4.66pt; font-family:Arial; font-size:10pt; font-weight:bold } .s94D2B4D8 { width:22.46%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt } .s3062523E { width:10.34%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt } .s86F27065 { width:15.5%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt } .s966C3182 { width:13.8%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt } .s505A3B93 { width:27.56%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt } .s85D93F52 { margin-left:36pt; text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:10pt; font-weight:bold } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt }   Communicated on 23 February 2018   SECOND SECTION Application no. 40875/12 Mehmet ŞAHİN and others against Turkey lodged on 20 April 2012 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns a reduction in the surface-area of the applicant’s plot of land in favour of the Treasury at the end of a cadastral litigation. Invoking Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention, the applicants complain that they were deprived of a part of their plot of land which they had acquire, ten years before the beginning of the cadastral process, on the strength of the surface-area mentioned by the land register. QUESTIONS tO THE PARTIES 1.     Have the applicants exhausted all effective domestic remedies, as required by Article   35 §   1 of the Convention? In particular, did an action based on article 1007 of the Civil Code constitute an effective remedy? If so, the Government are invited to provide the Court with the relevant case-law examples showing that this remedy is effective.   2.     In view of the title deed record dated 1965; did the applicants have a property within the meaning of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention? If so, did the registration of a part of the applicants’ land as the property of the Treasury constitute a violation of applicants’ right to peaceful enjoyment of their possession within the meaning of the same provision?   The parties are invited to provide the Court with all relevant documents concerning the case (such as expert reports, a cadastral survey report and land registry records).     N o . Firstname LASTNAME Birth year Nationality Place of residence Representative   Mehmet ŞAHİN 1952 Turkish Şanlıurfa A. Arıcı   Ayşe ASLAN 1977 Turkish Şanlıurfa A. Arıcı   Emine DEMİR 1962 Turkish Şanlıurfa A. Arıcı   Abdulkerim ŞAHİN 1973 Turkish Şanlıurfa A. Arıcı   Adile ŞAHİN 1942 Turkish Şanlıurfa A. Arıcı   Ahmet ŞAHİN 1958 Turkish Şanlıurfa A. Arıcı   Bekir ŞAHİN 1952 Turkish Şanlıurfa A. Arıcı   Fatma ŞAHİN 1978 Turkish Şanlıurfa A. Arıcı   Fatma ŞAHİN 1985 Turkish Şanlıurfa A. Arıcı   Halil ŞAHİN 1969 Turkish Şanlıurfa A. Arıcı   Halime ŞAHİN 1969 Turkish Şanlıurfa A. Arıcı   Hüseyin ŞAHİN 1976 Turkish Şanlıurfa A. Arıcı   Mehmet ŞAHİN 1982 Turkish Şanlıurfa A. Arıcı   Müslüm ŞAHİN 1979 Turkish Şanlıurfa A. Arıcı   Mustafa ŞAHİN 1961 Turkish Şanlıurfa A. Arıcı   Nazlı ŞAHİN 1950 Turkish Şanlıurfa A. Arıcı   Ömer ŞAHİN 1984 Turkish Sanlıurfa A. Arıcı   Zeynep ŞAHİN 1980 Turkish Şanlıurfa A. Arıcı   Vatfiye SAVAŞ (ŞAHİN) 1964 Turkish Şanlıurfa A. Arıcı   Nuriye ÜSTÜNDAĞ 1961 Turkish Şanlıurfa A. Arıcı   Zeliha YILMAZ 1965 Turkish Şanlıurfa A. Arıcı