CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 6 mars 2018

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA6BC7FA7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:right } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sC306B944 { width:108.56%; border-collapse:collapse } .s871A9F4C { width:8.64%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s598389F9 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:12pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sD35D798C { font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#474747 } .s461BDC5C { width:22.08%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s43415C74 { width:10.7%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDCAD4532 { width:17.24%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sC6E770DA { width:15.5%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s894DC4EE { width:25.84%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s319A263B { height:27.2pt } .s5660B5B { width:8.64%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s634D6A82 { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:12pt; font-weight:bold; list-style-position:inside } .sE74C84FB { width:20.99pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .sD21802FD { width:22.08%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt } .s1F746F80 { width:10.7%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt } .sF0B95BDF { width:17.24%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt } .s86F27065 { width:15.5%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt } .sE80663BC { width:25.84%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt }   Communicated on 6 March 2018   SECOND SECTION Application no. 36077/17 Fatma MEKİ and Fatma BİLDİRİCİ against Turkey lodged on 26 April 2017 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the substantial amount of lawyer’s fees imposed on the applicants by domestic courts as a result of expropriation proceedings brought against them by the administration. The applicants complain of a violation of their right under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention, arguing that the lawyer’s fees they had to pay were not proportionate to the compensation awarded to them. QUESTION tO THE PARTIES Has there been an interference with the applicants’ right to peaceful enjoyment of their possessions? In particular, did the fact that the applicants were ordered to pay lawyer’s fees to the expropriating public authority constitute an excessive burden which upset the fair balance which must be struck between the general interest of the community and the fundamental rights of the individual (see, mutatis mutandis , Perdigão v.   Portugal [GC], no.   24768/06, §§ 67-78, 16 November 2010)?   APPENDIX   N o . Firstname LASTNAME Birth year Nationality Place of residence Representative                 Fatma MEKİ 1960 Turkish Konya A. Aktay                 Fatma BİLDİRİCİ 1961 Turkish Konya A. Aktay