CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG — 15 mars 2018

.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .sCF71F55 { width:100%; border-collapse:collapse } .s829ABBD9 { border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-top:11.35pt; padding-bottom:10.98pt; vertical-align:middle } .s598389FB { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:14pt } .sDB9EB187 { font-weight:bold } .s598389F8 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:11pt } .sFBC99493 { font-style:italic } .s2D33099A { font-size:7.33pt; font-style:italic; vertical-align:super } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sE3D66594 { border:0.75pt solid #000000; border-collapse:collapse } .s41E9DBF5 { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s5FFF0A7F { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:9pt } .s24AC208E { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sF004B676 { border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sB30C44B0 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sC3AB69A { border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s2342A031 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s546C9D04 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s40B7A780 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s4F2EDFF { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s22F01CEB { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-18pt } .s37D58556 { width:14.67pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s876D4AB2 { text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } .sA8507A40 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:35.4pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s1A61A404 { margin-top:6pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-indent:35.4pt; text-align:justify } Resolution CM/ResDH(2018)107 Execution of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights 27 cases against the Republic of Moldova   (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 15 March 2018 at the 1310 th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies)     Application No. Case Judgment of Final on 12066/02 CIORAP 19/06/2007 19/09/2007 9190/03 BECCIEV 04/10/2005 04/01/2006 39806/05 PALADI 10/03/2009 Grand Chamber 10614/06+ ARSENIEV 20/03/2012 20/06/2012 36125/14 BAŞTOVOI 05/07/2016 05/07/2016 7481/06 CIORAP No 2 20/07/2010 20/10/2010 32896/07 CIORAP No. 3 04/12/2012 04/03/2013 37829/08 CONSTANTIN MODARCA 13/11/2012 13/02/2013 24163/11 CRISTIOGLO 26/04/2016 26/07/2016 60179/09 CULEV 17/04/2012 17/07/2012 29732/07 GALAIDA AND COPOSCIU 24/11/2016 24/11/2016 32844/07+ HADJI 14/02/2012 14/05/2012 15868/07 HARITONOV 05/07/2011 05/10/2011 30649/05 HOLOMIOV 07/11/2006 07/02/2007 8721/05+ ISTRATII AND OTHERS 27/03/2007 27/06/2007 7101/06 MALAI 13/11/2008 13/02/2009 53487/99 MERIAKRI 01/03/2005 06/07/2005 61050/11 MESCEREACOV 16/02/2016 16/05/2016 50054/07 MITROFAN 15/01/2013 15/04/2013 33200/11 OKOLISAN 29/03/2016 29/06/2016 38055/06 OPREA 21/12/2010 21/03/2011 35207/03 OSTROVAR 13/09/2005 15/02/2006 21061/11 PISAROGLU 03/03/2015 03/06/2015 51216/06 ROTARU 15/02/2011 15/05/2011 39584/07 SEGHETI 15/10/2013 15/01/2014 28173/10 SILVESTRU 13/01/2015 13/04/2015 11353/06 SHISHANOV 15/09/2015 15/12/2015   The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”),   Having regard to the final judgments transmitted by the Court to the Committee in these cases and to the violations established mainly on account of poor conditions of detention in the detention facilities under the authority of the Ministries of Justice and of the Interior, the lack of adequate medical care and the lack of an effective domestic remedy in both respects (violations of Articles 3 and 13);   Recalling the respondent State’s obligation, under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention, to abide by all final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and that this obligation entails, over and above the payment of any sums awarded by the Court, the adoption by the authorities of the respondent State, where required:   -           of individual measures to put an end to violations established and erase their consequences so as to achieve as far as possible restitutio in integrum ; and -           of general measures preventing similar violations;   Having invited the government of the respondent State to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with the above-mentioned obligation;   Having examined the information provided by the government indicating the individual measures adopted to give effect to the judgments including the information provided regarding the payment of the just satisfaction awarded by the Court (see documents DH-DD(2013)1168 , DH-DD(2016)897 , DH-DD(2017)379 , DH-DD(2018)33 );   Considering that the question of individual measures has been resolved, given that the applicants have either been released or transferred to another country or to another penitentiary facility in respect of which no further complaints have been received, and that all necessary individual measures have also been taken in respect of the other violations found by the Court;   Recalling that the question of the general measures required in response to the shortcomings found by the Court in the present judgments continues to be examined within the framework of the I.D. v. Republic of Moldova case (Application No. 47203/06) and that the closure of these cases therefore in no way prejudges the Committee’s evaluation of the general measures in relation to poor conditions of detention and the lack of effective domestic remedies;   DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in these cases as regards the individual measures and   DECIDES to close the examination of these cases.