CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG — 15 mars 2018

.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .sCF71F55 { width:100%; border-collapse:collapse } .s829ABBD9 { border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-top:11.35pt; padding-bottom:10.98pt; vertical-align:middle } .s598389FB { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:14pt } .sDB9EB187 { font-weight:bold } .s598389F8 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:11pt } .sFBC99493 { font-style:italic } .s2D33099A { font-size:7.33pt; font-style:italic; vertical-align:super } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sE3D66594 { border:0.75pt solid #000000; border-collapse:collapse } .s41E9DBF5 { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s5FFF0A7F { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:9pt } .sA54E3CC5 { font-size:6pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super } .s24AC208E { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sF004B676 { border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sB30C44B0 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sC3AB69A { border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s2342A031 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s546C9D04 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s40B7A780 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s4F2EDFF { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s22F01CEB { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-18pt } .s37D58556 { width:14.67pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s876D4AB2 { text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } .s3985515B { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sCCB68666 { margin-top:6pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-indent:36pt; text-align:justify } Resolution CM/ResDH(2018)109 Execution of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights 21 cases against Romania   (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 15 March 2018 at the 1310 th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies)     Application n o Case Judgment of Final on 27444/03 BABEI AND CLUCERESCU 23/06/2009 23/09/2009 37380/03 BALCAN 29/07/2008 29/10/2008 37805/05 COSTĂCHESCU 29/09/2009 24/01/2012 29/12/2009 24/04/2012 36297/02 DARNAI 08/12/2009 10/05/2010 25765/04 DELCA 04/11/2008 06/07/2009 2456/05+ GHIŢOI AND OTHERS 13/10/2009 13/01/2010 13386/02 MOLDOVEANU 29/07/2008 29/10/2008 67344/01+ MUSTEAŢĂ AND OTHERS 06/10/2009 06/01/2010 49182/06 NISTOR 28/06/2011 28/06/2011 26004/03 NIŢESCU 24/03/2009 24/06/2009 1486/02 ORHA 12/10/2006 04/11/2008 12/01/2007 04/11/2008 24714/03 PAICU 25/11/2008 25/02/2009 5050/02 PÂNTEA ELISABETA 15/06/2006 15/09/2006 34860/02 PIŞTIREANU 30/09/2008 30/12/2008 1690/05 POPA AURELIA 26/01/2010 26/04/2010 16294/03 S.C. BARTOLO PROD COM SRL AND BOTOMEI 21/02/2012 21/05/2012 29268/03 S.C. GHEPARDUL S.R.L. 14/04/2009 14/07/2009 35877/05 S.C. PRODCOMEXIM S.R.L. 27/10/2009 27/01/2010 67289/01 ŞANDOR 24/03/2005 24/06/2005 28333/02 SC RUXANDRA TRADING SRL 12/07/2007 02/12/2008 12/10/2007 02/03/2009 40263/05 STRĂCHINARU 21/02/2008 21/05/2008   The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”),   Having regard to the final judgments transmitted by the Court to the Committee in these cases and to the violations established on account of the failure or the delay by the State or legal entities under its responsibility to abide by final domestic court decisions (violations of Article 6 § 1 and/or 1 of Protocol No.   1);   Recalling the respondent State’s obligation, under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention, to abide by all final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and that this obligation entails, over and above the payment of any sums awarded by the Court, the adoption by the authorities of the respondent State, where required:   -           of individual measures to put an end to violations established and erase their consequences so as to achieve as far as possible restitutio in integrum ; and -           of general measures preventing similar violations;   Having invited the government of the respondent State to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with the above-mentioned obligation;   Having examined the information provided by the government indicating the individual measures adopted to give effect to the judgments, including the information provided regarding the payment of the just satisfaction awarded by the Court (see document DH-DD(2018)82 );   Considering that the question of individual measures has been resolved in these cases, given that the domestic court decisions at issue were implemented either before or after the date of the European Court’s judgments or that implementation is no longer possible due to objective circumstances;   Recalling also that the question of general measures required in response to the shortcomings found by the Court in these judgments continues to be examined within the framework of the judgments of the Săcăleanu group of cases which remain under the supervision of the Committee, and that the closure of the cases listed above in no way prejudges the Committee’s evaluation of the general measures required to resolve the problem of non-implementation or delay in the implementation of domestic court decisions by the State or by legal entities under its responsibility;   DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in these cases as regards the individual measures and   DECIDES to close the examination of these cases.