CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG — 15 mars 2018

.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .sCF71F55 { width:100%; border-collapse:collapse } .s829ABBD9 { border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-top:11.35pt; padding-bottom:10.98pt; vertical-align:middle } .s598389FB { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:14pt } .sDB9EB187 { font-weight:bold } .s3CC4D07E { font-size:12pt; font-weight:bold } .s598389F8 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:11pt } .sFBC99493 { font-style:italic } .s2D33099A { font-size:7.33pt; font-style:italic; vertical-align:super } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sE3D66594 { border:0.75pt solid #000000; border-collapse:collapse } .s41E9DBF5 { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s5FFF0A7F { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:9pt } .s24AC208E { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sF004B676 { border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sB30C44B0 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sC3AB69A { border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s2342A031 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s546C9D04 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s40B7A780 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s4F2EDFF { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s22F01CEB { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-18pt } .s37D58556 { width:14.67pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s3985515B { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sCEF2C954 { margin-top:6pt; margin-left:35.45pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-align:justify } Resolution CM/ResDH(2018)92 Execution of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights 52 cases against Serbia   (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 15 March 2018 at the 1310 th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies)     Application No. Case Judgment of Final on 41703/06 ADAMOVIĆ 02/10/2012 18/03/2013 57611/10+ ANĐELIĆ AND OTHERS 28/05/2013 28/05/2013 61604/10+ BLAGOJEVIĆ AND OTHERS 24/05/2016 24/05/2016 60336/08 BRANY AND JUGOKOKA 05/11/2013 05/11/2013 62208/13 BUGARIĆ 19/04/2016 19/04/2016 35835/05 CRNIŠANIN AND OTHERS 13/01/2009 13/04/2009 42731/06 DKD-UNION DOO 10/12/2013 10/12/2013 48499/08 DOO BROJLER DONJE SINKOVCE 26/11/2013 26/11/2013 80152/12 DRAGI PETROVIĆ 20/10/2015 20/10/2015 13339/11 GAVOVIĆ 24/02/2015 24/02/2015 75271/10+ GLIGORIĆ 26/11/2013 26/11/2013 16909/06+ GRIŠEVIĆ AND OTHERS 21/07/2009 21/10/2009 49915/08 IGNJATOVIĆ 25/04/2017 25/04/2017 13907/09+ JOVANOVIĆ AND OTHERS 15/07/2014 15/07/2014 21497/13+ JOVANOVIĆ 19/07/2016 19/07/2016 49198/10 JOVČOVA 05/11/2013 05/11/2013 37270/11 JOVIČIĆ AND OTHERS 13/01/2015 13/04/2015 59341/09 KOKA HYBRO KOMERC DOO BROYLER 14/03/2017 14/03/2017 58385/13 LJAJIĆ 21/07/2015 21/07/2015 44095/06 LOLIĆ 22/10/2013 22/01/2014 13344/11 LUČIĆ 24/02/2015 24/02/2015 67856/14+ M.B. - MAK ČAČAK DOO AND OTHERS 27/09/2016 27/09/2016 35327/09 MAJS EKSPORT-IMPORT 05/11/2013 05/11/2013 5353/11 MARINKOVIĆ 22/10/2013 22/01/2014 7159/12 McINNES 17/05/2016 17/05/2016 47922/08 MEĆAVA 22/05/2014 22/05/2014 7786/13+ MILENKOVIĆ AND VELJKOVIĆ 20/10/2015 20/10/2015 48966/09 MIVES DOO 10/01/2017 10/01/2017 9235/11 NIKOLIĆ AND OTHERS 24/01/2017 24/01/2017 54195/07 NIKOLIĆ-KRSTIĆ 14/10/2014 14/01/2015 57252/13 NUHOVIĆ AND KURTANOVIĆ 24/02/2015 24/02/2015 19978/14+ PAVLOVIĆ AND PANTOVIĆ 04/04/2017 04/04/2017 75280/10 PETROVIĆ 18/02/2014 18/02/2014 61920/09 PREMOVIĆ 14/01/2014 14/01/2014 9302/11 RADOVANOVIĆ 22/07/2014 22/07/2014 47939/11+ RAKIĆ AND SARVAN 20/10/2015 20/10/2015 78761/12 RAKIĆ 28/04/2015 28/04/2015 1789/07+ RASKOVIC AND MILUNOVIC 31/05/2011 31/08/2011 53736/08+ RIĐIĆ AND OTHERS 01/07/2014 01/10/2014 28686/06+ SEKULIĆ AND KUČEVIĆ 15/10/2013 15/01/2014 5928/13+ ŠERIFOVIĆ AND OTHERS 20/10/2015 20/10/2015 52590/10+ SIMONOVIĆ AND OTHERS 17/11/2015 17/11/2015 14130/14 SKORIĆ 28/06/2016 28/06/2016 36274/08 STOJILKOVIĆ AND OTHERS 05/03/2013 05/03/2013 75879/14+ STOKOVIĆ AND OTHERS 08/03/2016 08/03/2016 64931/10 STOŠIĆ 01/10/2013 01/01/2014 35081/10+ TEHNOGRADNJA DOO 14/03/2017 14/03/2017 5327/11+ TOMOVIĆ AND OTHERS 24/02/2015 24/02/2015 42619/04 VLAHOVIC 16/12/2008 16/03/2009 23496/13 VUKOSAVLJEVIĆ 27/09/2016 27/09/2016 65437/10+ ZARKOV 10/12/2013 10/12/2013 318/15 ŽIVKOVIĆ 04/04/2017 04/04/2017   The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”,   Having regard to the final judgments transmitted by the Court to the Committee in these cases and to the violations established on account of the non-enforcement of domestic judgments rendered against socially-owned companies;   Recalling the respondent State’s obligation, under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention, to abide by all final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and that this obligation entails, over and above the payment of any sums awarded by the Court, the adoption by the authorities of the respondent State, where required:   -           of individual measures to put an end to violations established and erase their consequences so as to achieve as far as possible restitutio in integrum ; and -           of general measures preventing similar violations;   Having invited the government of the respondent State to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with the above-mentioned obligation;   Having noted the information provided regarding the payment of the just satisfaction awarded by the Court;   Considering that the question of individual measures has been resolved since the domestic judgments were enforced;   Recalling that the question of general measures required in response to the shortcomings found by the Court in these judgments is being examined within the framework the cases R. Kačapor and Others (Application No. 2269/06) and Kin-Stib and Majkić (Application No. 12312/05) and that the closure of these cases therefore in no way prejudges the Committee’s evaluation of the general measures required;   DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in these cases as regards the individual measures and   DECIDES to close the examination of these cases.