CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 12 mars 2018

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA6BC7FA7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:right } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic }   Communicated on 12 March 2018   SECOND SECTION Application no. 15365/09 Şahabettin BAŞARAN against Turkey lodged on 16 February 2009 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the applicant’s inability to examine the witnesses against him and have examined those on his behalf under Article   6 §§ 1 and 3 (d) of the Convention. QUESTION tO THE PARTIES Was the applicant able to examine the witnesses against him and have examined those on his behalf as required by Article 6 § 3 (d) of the Convention? If not, has there been a breach of the applicant’s right to a fair trial provided by Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (d) of the Convention due to his inability to examine or have examined the witnesses (see Schatschaschwili v.   Germany [GC], no. 9154/10, §§ 100-131, ECHR 2015, and Daştan v.   Turkey , no. 37272/08, 10 October 2017)?   The Government are invited to submit copies of all the relevant documents concerning the applicants’ case, including but not limited to the minutes of all the hearings, documentary evidence against the applicant and the reasoned judgment(s) of the trial court, the applicant’s and his lawyer’s written submissions both before the trial court and before the Court of Cassation.