CEDHCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 17 avril 2018
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:001-182881
- Date
- 17 avril 2018
- Publication
- 17 avril 2018
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleCommunicated
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA6BC7FA7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:right } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase }   Communicated on 17 April 2018   FIFTH SECTION Application no. 8023/11 Elchin Gurbanali oglu MAMMADOV against Azerbaijan lodged on 21 January 2011 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the alleged lack of fairness of the criminal proceedings against the applicant who was convicted of high treason and violation of a combat duty jeopardising the State security and sentenced to twelve years’ imprisonment. Relying on Article 13 of the Convention the applicant complains that he was deprived of legal assistance at the initial stages of the pre-trial investigation. In particular, he alleges that for the most part of the pre-trial investigation he had a witness status and that his numerous requests to be provided legal assistance were rejected by the investigating officer. QUESTIONS tO THE PARTIES 1.     Did the applicant have a fair trial in the criminal proceedings against him, as required under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention? In particular, was the applicant afforded legal assistance as required under Article 6 § 3 (c) of the Convention?   2.     Taking into account the applicant’s allegations of denial of legal assistance during the pre-trial investigation, the Government are requested to produce copies of the records of the investigation actions with the applicant’s participation (i.e. records of interrogations, on-site examination, etc.) carried out between 13 November 2008 and 13 January 2009.Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
- Date
- 17 avril 2018
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:001-182881
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral
- Résumé officiel