CEDHCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 7 mai 2018
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:001-183496
- Date
- 7 mai 2018
- Publication
- 7 mai 2018
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleCommunicated
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA6BC7FA7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:right } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s75A32C27 { border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s8F670191 { font-family:Arial; font-size:12pt; list-style-position:inside } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold }   Communicated on 7 May 2018   FIRST SECTION Application no. 48345/12 Alexandros KANDARAKIS and Michail KANDARAKIS against Greece and 2 other applications (see list appended) SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The applicants are lawyers registered with the Athens Bar Association. After they had represented some clients in expropriation proceedings, a certain amount was awarded as court expenses, including the lawyers’ fees. Pursuant to Article 18 § 4 of the Expropriations Code (Law no. 2882/2001), the person liable for compensating persons whose property was expropriated deposits sums of court expenses to the Consignment Deposits and Loans Fund ( Ταμείο παρακαταθηκών και Δανείων ). The deposit takes place to the benefit of the Bar Association with which the representatives of the person whose property was expropriated are registered. Invoking Article 6 and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention, the applicants complain about the domestic courts’ decisions which dismissed their applications holding that only the relevant Bar Association could initiate proceedings requesting for the payment of court expenses. QUESTIONS tO THE PARTIES 1.     Have the applicants exhausted the domestic remedies in respect of their complaints under Article 6 and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention?   2.     Having regard to the domestic courts’ reasoning holding that only the relevant Bar Association could initiate proceedings requesting for the payment of court expenses, have the applicants been deprived of their right of access to a court in breach of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (see Philis v.   Greece (no. 1) , 27 August 1991, § 65, Series A no. 209)? 3.     Did the applicants have a possession or a legitimate expectation, within the meaning of Article 1 Protocol No. 1, in respect of payment of court expenses awarded by the domestic courts in the expropriation proceedings? If so, did the dismissal of their applications by the domestic courts amount to an interference with the applicant’s right to the peaceful enjoyment of possessions, within the meaning of Article 1 of Protocol   No.   1? If so, was that interference in breach of that provision?   No. Application no. Lodged on Applicant Date of birth Place of residence Represented by   48345/12 18/07/2012 Alexandros KANDARAKIS 30/10/1938 Athens Michail KANDARAKIS 04/04/1979 Athens   Vassilios CHIRDARIS   48348/12 18/07/2012 Alexandros KANDARAKIS 30/10/1938 Athens Michail KANDARAKIS 04/04/1979 Athens   Vassilios CHIRDARIS   67463/12 12/10/2012 Alexandros KANDARAKIS 30/10/1938 Athens   Vassilios CHIRDARIS    Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
- Date
- 7 mai 2018
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:001-183496
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral
- Résumé officiel