CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 31 mai 2018

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA6BC7FA7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:right } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s69FE014B { width:134.76%; border-collapse:collapse } .sD8F5C0B { width:6.96%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sD35D798C { font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#474747 } .s692D9367 { width:34.68%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sC50BF2F7 { width:13.92%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sF59B1C8A { width:20.86%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s8C1E374E { width:23.6%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sCDFAFC34 { width:6.96%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s3FA4A79A { font-family:Arial; font-size:12pt; font-weight:bold; list-style-position:inside } .sE74C84FB { width:20.99pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s4D8B3A84 { width:34.68%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s12102899 { width:13.92%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s215EFEB3 { width:20.86%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s34F623B2 { width:23.6%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top }   Communicated on 31 May 2018   FIRST SECTION Application no. 40556/09 Gaetana DI PIETRO and Others against Italy lodged on 20 July 2009 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The case concerns the expropriation of the applicants’ land and the calculation of the expropriation compensation due to them in accordance with Article 5bis of Law No. 359 of 1992 and Article 16 of Law No. 865 of 1971. Pursuant to the latter provisions, the applicants’ land had been classified as agricultural and they were awarded compensation reflecting the “average agricultural value” ( valore agricolo medio ) criterion. QUESTION tO THE PARTIES Have the applicants been deprived of their property in accordance with the requirements of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1? In particular, did the deprivation of property impose an excessive individual burden on the applicants on account of the amount awarded to them as expropriation compensation (see Preite v. Italy , no. 28976/05, 17 November 2015)?       N o . Firstname LASTNAME Birth year Place of residence Representative                 Gaetana DI PIETRO 1947 Niscemi A. Anfuso Alberghina                 Carmela DI PIETRO 1982 Niscemi A. Anfuso Alberghina                 Tommaso Maurizio DI PIETRO 1989 Niscemi A. Anfuso Alberghina