CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG — 4 juillet 2018

.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .sCF71F55 { width:100%; border-collapse:collapse } .s829ABBD9 { border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-top:11.35pt; padding-bottom:10.98pt; vertical-align:middle } .s598389FB { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:14pt } .sDB9EB187 { font-weight:bold } .s3CC4D07E { font-size:12pt; font-weight:bold } .s598389F8 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:11pt } .sFBC99493 { font-style:italic } .s2D33099A { font-size:7.33pt; font-style:italic; vertical-align:super } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sE3D66594 { border:0.75pt solid #000000; border-collapse:collapse } .s41E9DBF5 { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s5FFF0A7F { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:9pt } .s24AC208E { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sF004B676 { border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sB30C44B0 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sC3AB69A { border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s2342A031 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s546C9D04 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s40B7A780 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s4F2EDFF { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s22F01CEB { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-18pt } .s37D58556 { width:14.67pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s876D4AB2 { text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s114AEA21 { font-size:9pt } .sA8507A40 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:35.4pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sCEF2C954 { margin-top:6pt; margin-left:35.45pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-align:justify } Resolution CM/ResDH(2018)266 Execution of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights 16 cases against Turkey   (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 4 July 2018 at the 1321 st meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies)     Application No. Case Judgment of Final on 60366/00 KAHRAMAN 31/10/2006 31/01/2007 15067/04 CEVAHIRLI 19/10/2010 19/01/2011 26718/05 ÇATAK 06/10/2009 06/01/2010 2843/05 TEVFİK OKUR 29/09/2009 29/12/2009 3055/04 TOPAL 21/04/2009 21/07/2009 38011/05 MERDAN 29/09/2009 29/12/2009 38287/04+ TAMAY AND OTHERS 29/09/2009 01/03/2010 4027/05 KARAARSLAN 27/07/2010 27/10/2010 43554/04 İLTER 29/09/2009 29/12/2009 43696/04 OKAN ERDOĞAN 29/09/2009 29/12/2009 43980/04 MIRAN 21/04/2009 21/07/2009 44058/04 ÖZCAN KORKMAZ AND OTHERS 01/12/2009 08/07/2010 44292/04 CIHANGÜL 29/09/2009 29/12/2009 59739/00 GÜNER ÇORUM 31/10/2006 31/01/2007 59741/00 AKSOY (EROĞLU) 31/10/2006 31/01/2007 9871/05 AKIN ŞAHIN 14/09/2010 14/12/2010   The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”),   Having regard to the final judgments transmitted by the Court to the Committee in these cases and to the violations established;   Recalling the respondent State’s obligation, under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention, to abide by all final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and that this obligation entails, over and above the payment of any sums awarded by the Court, the adoption by the authorities of the respondent State, where required:   -           of individual measures to put an end to violations established and erase their consequences so as to achieve as far as possible restitutio in integrum ; and -           of general measures preventing similar violations;   Having invited the government of the respondent State to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with the above-mentioned obligation;   Having examined the action report provided by the government indicating the measures adopted in order to give effect to the judgments including the information provided regarding the payment of the just satisfaction awarded by the Court (see document DH-DD(2018)86-rev );   Recalling that the violations of the Convention found by the Court in these cases primarily concern the right to a fair trial on account of the applicants’ lack of access to classified documents; other violations concern the right to a fair trial on account of the non-communication of the written opinion of the general prosecutor to the applicants during the proceedings before the Supreme Military Administrative Court (violations of article 6, paragraph 1) in the cases of Tevfik Okur (2843/05), Tamay and Others (38287/04), Karaarslan (4027/05), Okan Erdoğan (43696/04) , Miran (43980/04), Özcan Korkmaz and Others (44058/04) and Cihangül (44292/04) (this issue was examined under the Dikel group of cases (see Final Resolution CM/ResDH(2014)124 );   Having satisfied itself that all the measures required by Article 46, paragraph 1, have been adopted,   DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in these cases and   DECIDES to close the examination thereof.