CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 13 juillet 2018

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA6BC7FA7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:right } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .sD3B63DAD { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .sC8636342 { border:0.75pt solid #808080; border-collapse:collapse } .s43245D7A { height:27.55pt } .sD1CDDC62 { border-right:0.75pt solid #808080; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #808080; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#e0e0e0 } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s2490CDBC { border-right:0.75pt solid #808080; border-left:0.75pt solid #808080; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #808080; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#e0e0e0 } .s8DB21C27 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .s26ADB50A { border-left:0.75pt solid #808080; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #808080; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#e0e0e0 } .sFD306575 { height:35.55pt } .s2F4AF114 { border-top:0.75pt solid #808080; border-right:0.75pt solid #808080; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #808080; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s6CF83D49 { margin-left:11.67pt; padding-left:6.18pt; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; font-weight:bold } .s898DAE93 { border:0.75pt solid #808080; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s299B0C57 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:0.45pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-0.45pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sB71F2881 { border-top:0.75pt solid #808080; border-left:0.75pt solid #808080; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #808080; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .sCC018295 { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; vertical-align:super; color:#0069d6 } .s7A164DFD { height:49pt } .sFD82DC6 { margin-left:16.12pt; padding-left:1.73pt; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; font-weight:bold } .s268BE78A { height:13.7pt } .sB217F55D { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify; font-size:8pt } .sBCA334AF { border-top:0.75pt solid #808080; border-right:0.75pt solid #808080; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s7CB6920E { border-top:0.75pt solid #808080; border-right:0.75pt solid #808080; border-left:0.75pt solid #808080; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s62945D10 { border-top:0.75pt solid #808080; border-left:0.75pt solid #808080; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s2EB42ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:10pt } .sC36A6361 { font-family:Arial; color:#000000 } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic }   Communicated on 13 July 2018   THIRD SECTION Application no. 55003/16 Marko RADOVANOVIĆ against Serbia and 11 others – see appended list STATEMENT OF FACTS The applicants’ personal information, information regarding their legal counsel, and the relevant factual details concerning their cases, respectively, are set out in the appended table. Generally speaking, all applicants obtained final court judgments in their favour, according to which the socially/State-owned company in question was ordered to pay them their salary arrears. The competent domestic courts awarded each applicant a certain sum as compensation for the non-pecuniary damage suffered because of the length of the impugned enforcement proceedings, respectively (see the appended table). All these decisions were subsequently upheld by the Supreme Court of Cassation. Lastly, between 12 May 2016 and 6 July 2017, the Constitutional Court, while deciding on the appeals lodged by each of the applicants, found a violation of their respective property rights and ordered the State to pay them, in respect of the pecuniary damage suffered, the sums awarded in the final domestic judgments rendered in their favour. By August 2017, those sums were paid to the applicants in their entirety. However, the Constitutional Court rejected the applicants’ complaints in respect of non-pecuniary damage. COMPLAINTS Relying on Article 6 of the Convention, the applicants complain about the length of their enforcement proceedings, as well as the preceding civil suits, respectively. They further complain under Article 13 of the Convention about the absence of effective domestic remedies in this regard. QUESTIONS tO THE PARTIES 1.     Was the length of the enforcement proceedings as well as the preceding civil suits in the present cases in breach of the “reasonable time” requirement of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention?   2.     Did the applicants, in this respect, have at their disposal effective domestic remedies, as required by Article   13 of the Convention? Appendix No. Application no. and date of introduction Applicant’s name Date of birth Place of residence ationality Represented by Final domestic decision details Enforcement order details Other decision details; Just satisfaction awarded for the non-pecuniary damage suffered   55003/16 10/09/2016 Marko RADOVANOVIĆ 10/05/1968 Čačak Serbian Dragana JANKOVIĆ Municipal Court in Čačak P1.37/2003 13/10/2008 Municipal Court in Čačak I841/09 12/06/2009 Court of Appeals in Kragujevac R4-r-161/14 27/04/2015 50.000 [1]   55165/16 10/09/2016 Milun STEVANOVIĆ 26/07/1959 Čačak Serbian Dragana JANKOVIĆ Municipal Court in Čačak P1.222/2009 18/05/2009 Municipal Court in Čačak I.1454/09 19/10/2009 High Court in Čačak R4.I.167/14 15/01/2015 200 euros   55199/16 10/09/2016 Milivoje KUJUNDŽIĆ 07/10/1950 Čačak Serbian Dragana JANKOVIĆ Municipal Court in Čačak P1.37/03 13/10/2008 Municipal Court in Čačak I.841/09 12/06/2009 Court of Appeals in Kragujevac R4-r-161/14 27/04/2015 50.000 [2]   58368/16 23/09/2016 Miljan ČUKANOVIĆ 15/12/1949 Čačak Serbian Dragana JANKOVIĆ Municipal Court in Čačak P1.1196/2002 29/05/2008 Municipal Court in Čačak I.1070/08 04/08/2008 High Court in Čačak R4-I.252/14 03/02/2015 100 euros   14938/17 14/02/2017 Anđelija ŠIPETIĆ 26/04/1954 Čačak Serbian Ivana KRUNIĆ Municipal Court in Čačak P1.890/04 17/03/2008 Municipal Court in Čačak I.159/09 05/02/2009 High Court in Čačak R4-I.205/14 14/04/2015 150 euros   20906/17 06/03/2017 Milan MIRKOVIĆ 17/04/1952 Čačak Serbian Ivana KRUNIĆ Municipal Court in Čačak P1.729/03 10/06/2008 Municipal Court in Čačak P1.142/09 18/05/2009 Municipal Court in Čačak I.1240/09 18/09/2009 High Court in Čačak R4.I.206/14 29/12/2014 200 euros   22606/17 15/03/2017 Milutin BOJOVIĆ 21/09/1949 Čačak Serbian Dragana JANKOVIĆ Municipal Court in Čačak P1.710/2007 31/01/2008 Municipal Court in Čačak I.1603/08 01/12/2008 High Court in Čačak R4-I-256/14 30/03/2015 150 euros   25312/17 20/03/2017 Dragana TOMOVIĆ 08/12/1963 Čačak Serbian Ivana KRUNIĆ Municipal Court in Čačak P1.146/08 19/11/2008 Municipal Court in Čačak I.158/09 05/02/2009 High Court in Čačak R4I.260/14 02/02/2015 100 euros   61028/17 12/08/2017 Miroslav SIMEUNOVIĆ 15/05/1962 Čačak Serbian Dragana JANKOVIĆ Municipal Court in Čačak P1.1240/03 12/03/2008 Municipal Court in Čačak I.838/08 07/07/2008 High Court in Čačak R4(I).350/15 04/12/2015 30,000 [3]   61340/17 12/08/2017 Milojko ĐAKOVIĆ 06/12/1956 Čačak Serbian Dragana JANKOVIĆ Municipal Court in Čačak P1.1240/03 12/03/2008 Municipal Court in Čačak I.838/08 07/07/2008 High Court in Čačak R4(I).350/15 04/12/2015 30,000 [4]   77837/17 04/11/2017 Miroslav PETRIĆ 16/05/1962 Čačak Serbian Dragana JANKOVIĆ Municipal Court in Čačak P1.31/03 13/01/2009 Municipal Court in Čačak I.1249/09 01/09/2009 High Court in Čačak 3R4.I.207/14 22/12/2014 100 euros   77858/17 04/11/2017 Nebojša BIŠEVAC 03/08/1953 Čačak Serbian Dragana JANKOVIĆ Municipal Court in Čačak P1.31/03 13/01/2009 Municipal Court in Čačak I.1249/09 01/09/2009 High Court in Čačak 3R4.I.207/14 22/12/2014 100 euros   [1] .     RSD 50.000 was approximately 400 euros on the date on which the Court of Appeals in Kragujevac rendered the decision. [2] .     Ibid . [3] .     RSD 30.000 was approximately 250 euros on the date on which the Court of Appeals in Kragujevac rendered the decision. [4] .     Ibid .