CEDHCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 28 août 2018
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:001-186362
- Date
- 28 août 2018
- Publication
- 28 août 2018
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleCommunicated
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA6BC7FA7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:right } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .sA56BACAB { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; list-style-position:inside } .s13783063 { width:6.24pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s3537C2D6 { font-weight:normal }   Communicated on 28 August 2018   SECOND SECTION Application no. 61016/16 Hakime ŞENGÜL and others against Turkey lodged on 26 September 2016 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the abduction and subsequent killing of the first applicant’s husband and the remaining applicants’ father Abdülmecit Şengül. The applicants rely on Articles 2, 6 and 13 of the Convention and allege, in particular, that no effective investigation was conducted into the abduction and killing. QUESTIONS tO THE PARTIES 1.     Did the applicants have an “arguable claim” that there had been a violation of their rights under Article   2 of the Convention?   2.     Was the decision of the Constitutional Court not to examine the applicants’ complaints concerning the killing of their relative from the standpoint of the right to life – to which the applicants expressly referred in the application form they submitted to that court – compatible with the obligation to provide an effective remedy within the meaning of Article   13 of the Convention read in conjunction with Article 2 of the Convention?       Hakime ŞENGÜL is a Turkish national who was born in 1958, lives in Siirt and is represented by Ferhat. Bayındır     Amine NAYMAN is a Turkish national who was born in 1987, lives in Siirt and is represented by Ferhat Bayındır     Abdurrahman ŞENGÜL is a Turkish national who was born in 1978, lives in Siirt and is represented by Ferhat Bayındır     Aycan ŞENGÜL is a Turkish national who was born in 1977, lives in Siirt and is represented by Ferhat Bayındır     Emel ŞENGÜL is a Turkish national who was born in 1990, lives in Siirt and is represented by Ferhat Bayındır     Merve ŞENGÜL is a Turkish national who was born in 1995, lives in Siirt and is represented by Ferhat Bayındır     Ümit ŞENGÜL is a Turkish national who was born in 1993, lives in Siirt and is represented by Ferhat Bayındır     Yusuf ŞENGÜL is a Turkish national who was born in 1974, lives in Siirt and is represented by Ferhat Bayındır  Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
- Date
- 28 août 2018
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:001-186362
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral
- Résumé officiel