CEDHCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 5 septembre 2018
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:001-186617
- Date
- 5 septembre 2018
- Publication
- 5 septembre 2018
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleCommunicated
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA6BC7FA7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:right } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .sA56BACAB { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; list-style-position:inside } .s13783063 { width:6.24pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s3537C2D6 { font-weight:normal }   Communicated on 5 September 2018   SECOND SECTION Application no. 33339/16 Dilgeş SARAÇ and Hacer SARAÇ against Turkey lodged on 27 May 2016 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the death of the first applicant’s father and the second applicant’s husband Fahri Saraç when the vehicle in which he was travelling was hit by an armoured military vehicle. The applicants complain of a violation of, inter alia , Article 2 of the Convention and allege, in particular, that the national authorities failed to carry out an effective investigation into the circumstances surrounding the death. QUESTIONS tO THE PARTIES 1.     Did the applicants have an “arguable claim” that there had been a violation of their rights under Article   2 of the Convention?   2.     Was the decision of the Constitutional Court not to examine the applicants’ complaints concerning the death of their relative from the standpoint of the right to life – to which the applicants expressly referred in the application form they submitted to that court – compatible with the obligation to provide an effective remedy within the meaning of Article   13 of the Convention read in conjunction with Article 2 of the Convention? APPENDIX       Dilgeş SARAÇ is a Turkish national who was born in 1993, lives in Hakkari and is represented by Mürsel Ekici     Hacer SARAÇ is a Turkish national who was born in 1972, lives in Hakkari and is represented by Mürsel Ekici  Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
- Date
- 5 septembre 2018
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:001-186617
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral
- Résumé officiel