CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG — 20 septembre 2018

.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .sCF71F55 { width:100%; border-collapse:collapse } .s829ABBD9 { border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-top:11.35pt; padding-bottom:10.98pt; vertical-align:middle } .s598389FB { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:14pt } .sDB9EB187 { font-weight:bold } .s3CC4D07E { font-size:12pt; font-weight:bold } .s598389F8 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:11pt } .sFBC99493 { font-style:italic } .s2D33099A { font-size:7.33pt; font-style:italic; vertical-align:super } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sE3D66594 { border:0.75pt solid #000000; border-collapse:collapse } .s41E9DBF5 { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s5FFF0A7F { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:9pt } .s24AC208E { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sF004B676 { border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sB30C44B0 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sC3AB69A { border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s2342A031 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s546C9D04 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s40B7A780 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s4F2EDFF { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s22F01CEB { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-18pt } .s37D58556 { width:14.67pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s876D4AB2 { text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } .s5A722CD { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:35.45pt; margin-bottom:0pt } Resolution CM/ResDH(2018)349 Execution of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights 16 cases against Albania   (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 20 September 2018 at the 1324 th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies)     Application No. Case Judgment of Final on 604/07+ MANUSHAQE PUTO AND OTHERS 31/07/2012 04/11/2014 17/12/2012 23/03/2015 25408/06+ KARAGJOZI AND OTHERS 08/04/2014 08/04/2014 30264/08+ METALLA AND OTHERS 16/07/2015 16/07/2015 32382/11 KARAGJOZI AND OTHERS 07/04/2016 07/04/2016 33839/11 HALIMI AND OTHERS 07/04/2016 07/04/2016 33771/02 DRIZA 13/11/2007 02/06/2008 7352/03 BESHIRI AND OTHERS 22/08/2006 12/02/2007 6397/04 BUSHATI AND OTHERS 08/12/2009 14/02/2012 08/03/2010 14/05/2012 10810/05 CAUSH DRIZA 15/03/2011 15/06/2011 49106/06 DELVINA 08/03/2011 21/05/2013 08/06/2011 07/10/2013 16530/06 ELTARI 08/03/2011 10/06/2014 15/09/2011 10/09/2014 45264/04 HAMZARAJ No.1 03/02/2009 06/07/2009 12306/04 NURI 03/02/2009 06/07/2009 38222/02 RAMADHI AND 5 OTHERS 13/11/2007 02/06/2008 35720/04+ VRIONI AND OTHERS 29/09/2009 07/12/2010 29/12/2009 11/04/2011 37295/05+ SILIQI AND OTHERS 10/03/2015 10/03/2015   The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”),   Having regard to the final judgments transmitted by the Court to the Committee in these cases and to the violations of Article 6 § 1, Article 13 and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 on account of a structural problem of the absence of an adequate mechanism to honour the commitment made by the State to compensate for property nationalised under the communist regime and to enforce final domestic judicial and administrative decisions recognising the right to compensation (pecuniary or in kind);   Recalling the respondent State’s obligation, under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention, to abide by all final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and that this obligation entails, over and above the payment of any sums awarded by the Court, the adoption by the authorities of the respondent State, where required:   -           of individual measures to put an end to violations established and erase their consequences so as to achieve as far as possible restitutio in integrum ; and -           of general measures preventing similar violations;   Having invited the government of the respondent State to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with the above-mentioned obligation;   Having examined the action report provided by the government indicating the measures adopted in order to give effect to the judgments (see document DH-DD(2018)793 );   Having noted that the government of the respondent State paid the applicants the just satisfaction provided for in the judgments and secured enforcement of relevant final domestic decisions in the cases where no just satisfaction was awarded in respect of pecuniary damage;   Recalling with satisfaction the major efforts deployed by the Albanian authorities to abide by the judgments of the Court and honour their undertaking to provide compensation for property nationalised under the Communist regime, and to put an end to the long-standing absence of any effective mechanism to this end and noting in particular the sustained political, financial and technical support provided since 2014;   Welcoming the ensuing adoption of a new compensation mechanism in 2015 and its successful implementation in practice;   Recalling in this connection the fruitful co-operation between the Albanian authorities and the Council of Europe in the process of designing and implementing the compensation mechanism with the support of the Human Rights Trust Fund;   Noting that the new compensation mechanism has also been positively evaluated by the Venice Commission and accepted by the Albanian Constitutional Court;   Noting further the significant results already obtained in the process of evaluation of claims and the number of final decisions issued and enforced so far, as well as the very significant resources allocated from the State budget to cover payment of all compensation claims (with a Financial Fund of 50 billion Albanian Leks and a Land Fund estimated at 99 billion Albanian Leks – a total of about 1.2 billion Euros);   Noting finally that the implementation of Law No. 133 of 5 December 2015, including respect of the relevant deadlines, is closely monitored by new national mechanisms which have proven effective;   Having thus satisfied itself that all the measures required by Article 46, paragraph 1, have been adopted in the above respects;   Noting in addition that the general measures required in response to other violations of Article 6 of the Convention, namely related to the lack of legal certainty and the absence of impartiality of the Supreme Court were examined in the framework of the Caka group of cases (application No. 44023/02), which was closed by Resolution CM/ResDH(2017)417 of 7 December 2017;   DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in the cases listed above and   DECIDES to close the examination thereof.