CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG — 14 novembre 2018

.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .sCF71F55 { width:100%; border-collapse:collapse } .s829ABBD9 { border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-top:11.35pt; padding-bottom:10.98pt; vertical-align:middle } .s598389FB { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:14pt } .sDB9EB187 { font-weight:bold } .s3CC4D07E { font-size:12pt; font-weight:bold } .s598389F8 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:11pt } .sFBC99493 { font-style:italic } .s2D33099A { font-size:7.33pt; font-style:italic; vertical-align:super } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sE3D66594 { border:0.75pt solid #000000; border-collapse:collapse } .s41E9DBF5 { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s5FFF0A7F { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:9pt } .s24AC208E { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sF004B676 { border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sB30C44B0 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sC3AB69A { border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s2342A031 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s546C9D04 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s40B7A780 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s4F2EDFF { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s22F01CEB { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-18pt } .s37D58556 { width:14.67pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s876D4AB2 { text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } .sA8507A40 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:35.4pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s5A722CD { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:35.45pt; margin-bottom:0pt } Resolution CM/ResDH(2018)422 Execution of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights 22 cases against Turkey   (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 14 November 2018 at the 1329 th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies)     Application No. Case Judgment of Final on 32219/05 TANIŞMA 17/11/2015 27/06/2017 02/05/2016 27/09/2017 53803/11 AKGÜL 13/06/2017 13/06/2017 51144/06 BARIŞ DEMİR 24/10/2017 24/10/2017 11318/10 BAŞTÜRK 16/05/2017 16/05/2017 54135/07 BİLGİÇ 28/11/2017 28/11/2017 9626/12 ÇALAR 28/11/2017 28/11/2017 38958/12 ÇULHAOĞLU 12/12/2017 12/12/2017 54901/10 ERDEN 13/02/2018 13/02/2018 40757/10 İNAN 28/11/2017 28/11/2017 332/13 KAYA 12/12/2017 12/12/2017 46227/11 KILIÇ 12/12/2017 12/12/2017 42289/11 KÖK 28/11/2017 28/11/2017 48756/11 MEHMET HİDAYET ALTUN AND OTHERS 14/11/2017 14/02/2018 30953/09+ ÖZSOY AND YILDIRIM 28/11/2017 28/11/2017 72006/10 PALİTKIRAN 10/10/2017 10/10/2017 20184/06 SÜRER 31/05/2016 17/10/2016 43868/06 TAŞÇI 10/10/2017 10/01/2018 53802/11 TUNÇ 13/06/2017 13/06/2017 58661/09 ÜÇEL 28/11/2017 28/11/2017 24087/07 YELTEPE 14/03/2017 14/06/2017 12723/11 YİVLİ 14/11/2017 14/11/2017 54957/09+ YUMUŞAK AND OTHERS 12/12/2017 12/12/2017   The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”),   Having regard to the final judgments transmitted by the Court to the Committee in these cases and to the violations established;   Recalling the respondent State’s obligation, under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention, to abide by all final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and that this obligation entails, over and above the payment of any sums awarded by the Court, the adoption by the authorities of the respondent State, where required:   -           of individual measures to put an end to violations established and erase their consequences so as to achieve as far as possible restitutio in integrum ; and -           of general measures preventing similar violations;   Having invited the government of the respondent State to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with the above-mentioned obligation;   Having examined the action report provided by the government indicating the measures adopted to give effect to the judgments, including the information provided regarding the payment of the just satisfaction awarded by the Court (see document DH-DD(2018)743 );   Recalling that the Committee closed the examination of other similar cases concerning the violation of the right to a fair trial on account of the non-communication of the written opinion of the principal public prosecutor to the applicants during proceedings before the Supreme Military Administrative Court (see Final Resolution CM/ResDH(2018)266 in the Kahraman group of cases);   Having satisfied itself that all the measures required by Article 46, paragraph 1, have been adopted,   DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in these cases and   DECIDES to close the examination thereof.