CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG — 6 décembre 2018

.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .sCF71F55 { width:100%; border-collapse:collapse } .s829ABBD9 { border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-top:11.35pt; padding-bottom:10.98pt; vertical-align:middle } .s598389FB { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:14pt } .sDB9EB187 { font-weight:bold } .s3CC4D07E { font-size:12pt; font-weight:bold } .s598389F8 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:11pt } .sFBC99493 { font-style:italic } .s2D33099A { font-size:7.33pt; font-style:italic; vertical-align:super } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sE3D66594 { border:0.75pt solid #000000; border-collapse:collapse } .s41E9DBF5 { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s5FFF0A7F { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:9pt } .s24AC208E { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sF004B676 { border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sB30C44B0 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sC3AB69A { border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s2342A031 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s546C9D04 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s40B7A780 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s4F2EDFF { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s22F01CEB { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-18pt } .s37D58556 { width:14.67pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s876D4AB2 { text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } .s3985515B { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s944BDE53 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:36pt } Resolution CM/ResDH(2018)466 Execution of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights Ten cases against Portugal   (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 6 December 2018 at the 1331 st meeting of the Ministers' Deputies)     Application No. Case Judgment of Final on 23603/14 ALBERTINA CARVALHO E FILHOS LDA 04/07/2017 04/07/2017 5190/14 LEONG POY 08/12/2015 08/12/2015 28041/13 APARECIDA DE OLIVEIRA NABOR   05/04/2016 05/04/2016 70692/13 AUSTIN AND BUDIARTINI 25/07/2017 25/07/2017 75415/13 CARNEIRO DA SILVA 14/03/2017 14/03/2017 69062/13 CUNHA MARTINS DA SILVA COUTO 28/02/2017 28/02/2017 62252/12 ESCALDA FERREIRA 12/01/2016 12/01/2016 8349/13 FREITAS 12/01/2016 12/01/2016 63582/13 NUNES LUCAS SARAIVA 04/10/2016 04/10/2016 39507/13 VEIGA DA SILVA BRAGA 26/07/2016 26/07/2016   The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”);   Having regard to the final judgments transmitted by the Court to the Committee in these cases and to the violations of Article 6, paragraph 1, of the Convention due to the excessive length of civil proceedings and enforcement proceedings before the courts of first instance; having regard also to the violations of Article 13 in the cases of Aparecida de Oliveira Nabor , Nunes Lucas Saraiva and Carneiro da Silva due to the lack of an effective remedy, before 2014, to obtain redress for the excessive length of court proceedings;   Recalling the respondent State’s obligation, under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention, to abide by all final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and that this obligation entails, over and above the payment of any sums awarded by the Court, the adoption by the authorities of the respondent State, where required:   -           of individual measures to put an end to violations established and erase their consequences so as to achieve as far as possible restitutio in integrum ; and -           of general measures preventing similar violations;   Having examined the information regularly provided by the government indicating the individual measures adopted in order to give effect to the judgments, including the information provided regarding the payment of the just satisfaction awarded by the Court;   Considering that the question of individual measures has been resolved in these cases, given that the just satisfaction, when awarded by the Court, was paid to the applicants and that the domestic proceedings at issue were concluded either before or after the judgments of the Court;   Underlining that the closure of these cases in no way prejudges the Committee’s evaluation of the general measures in relation to the excessive length of civil proceedings and enforcement proceedings before the courts of first instance, to be pursued in the framework of the cases of the Vicente Cardoso group;   Recalling that the questions related to the absence of an effective remedy to obtain redress for the excessive length of court proceedings in Portugal were examined in the context of the supervision of the Martins Castro and Alves Correia de Castro group of cases (Final Resolution CM/ResDH(2016)98 );   DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in these cases as regards the individual measures and   DECIDES to close the examination of these cases.