CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 14 décembre 2018

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA6BC7FA7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:right } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic }   Communicated on 14 December 2018   THIRD SECTION Application no. 12608/18 Ignjat ĐORĐEVIĆ against Serbia lodged on 2 March 2018 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the forced stripping of the applicant at a public nursery school, when he was seven years old. Shortly after the incident, the school dismissed the teacher in question, filed a criminal complaint against her, provided psychological support to the applicant and paid him around 2,100 euros in respect of non-pecuniary damage. The civil courts awarded the applicant an additional amount of around 2,100 euros in respect of non ‑ pecuniary damage. The applicant complains about the incident under Article 3 (the substantive aspect). QUESTION tO THE PARTIES Has the applicant’s forced stripping at a public nursery school amount to a violation of Article   3 of the Convention (see Lyalyakin v. Russia , no.   31305/09, 12 March 2015 and V.K. v. Russia , no. 68059/13, 7 March 2017)?