CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 8 janvier 2019

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA6BC7FA7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:right } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .sCC0A190 { width:109.26%; border-collapse:collapse } .sFFAC2F38 { height:30pt } .s34BFDD1F { width:8.16%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sC2015514 { width:21.64%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s75CDEFF7 { width:11.44%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sF9B3AFBF { width:18.7%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s3C4B9ACB { width:16.12%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s7DF82344 { width:23.96%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sC852A8EE { width:8.16%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s1B33F3B0 { margin-left:15.01pt; text-align:center; padding-left:20.99pt; font-family:Arial; font-size:12pt; font-weight:bold } .s62944EF { width:21.64%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s30298D6F { width:11.44%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s2432F201 { width:18.7%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sED72F51C { width:16.12%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s9310651E { width:23.96%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top }   Communicated on 8 January 2019   SECOND SECTION Application no. 57574/13 Pavel LEVINȚA and Vitalie LEVINTA against the Republic of Moldova lodged on 10 August 2013 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the applicants’ conviction on the basis of self ‑ incriminating confessions obtained from them by means of torture. Moreover, the courts relied on statements of co-accused persons which had been deemed unreliable in a different but identical set of criminal proceedings relating to the same facts. The case is a follow-up to Levința v.   Moldova , no. 17332/03, 16 December 2008. The applicants complain that the criminal proceedings against them were not fair within the meaning of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention. QUESTIONS tO THE PARTIES 1.     Did the applicants have a fair hearing in the determination of the criminal charge(s) against them, in accordance with Article   6 §   1 of the Convention?   2.     The Government are requested to submit a full copy of the case-file in the domestic proceedings.   APPENDIX   No. Firstname LASTNAME Birth year Nationality Place of residence Representative   Pavel LEVINȚA 1974 Moldovan Chișinău V. Ţurcan   Vitalie LEVINȚA 1971 Moldovan Chişinău V. Ţurcan