CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 14 janvier 2019

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA6BC7FA7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:right } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic }   Communicated on 14 January 2019   FIFTH SECTION Application no. 10616/17 llgar GURBANOV against Azerbaijan lodged on 31 January 2017 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the alleged failure by the Supreme Court, in proceedings related to the applicant’s dismissal from the State service, to duly inform the applicant and/or his lawyer of the date and time of the hearing before it which, as a result, was held in their absence. QUESTION tO THE PARTIES Did the applicant have a fair hearing in the determination of his civil rights and obligations, in accordance with Article 6 § 1 of the Convention? In particular, were the applicant and/or his lawyer duly notified about the hearing before the Supreme Court (see Pirali Orujov v. Azerbaijan , no.   8460/07, §§ 40-46, 3 February 2011; Maksimov v. Azerbaijan , no.   38228/05, §§ 36-43, 8 October 2009; Abbasov v. Azerbaijan , no.   24271/05, §§ 28-34, 17 January 2008)?