CEDHCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 15 janvier 2019
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:001-189928
- Date
- 15 janvier 2019
- Publication
- 15 janvier 2019
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleCommunicated
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA6BC7FA7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:right } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .sA56BACAB { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; list-style-position:inside } .s13783063 { width:6.24pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s3537C2D6 { font-weight:normal }   Communicated on 15 January 2019   FIRST SECTION Application no. 80046/17 A and B against the United Kingdom lodged on 9 November 2017 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE In Northern Ireland abortion is only lawful in very narrow circumstances and many pregnant women ordinarily resident there travel to England in order to access abortion services. Prior to June 2017 women who did so were not entitled to obtain an abortion free of charge under the National Health Service (as women ordinarily resident in England were entitled to do) and instead had to attend private, fee-paying clinics. The applicants – a mother and daughter – argue that the failure to provide for the first applicant, a United Kingdom citizen resident in Northern Ireland, to have an abortion in England free of charge under the National Health Service in late 2012 breached their rights under Article 14 of the Convention read together with Article 8. Although the applicants were ultimately unsuccessful in proceedings before the domestic courts, with the Supreme Court narrowly dismissing their appeal on 14 June 2017, on 23 June 2017 the Minister for Women and Equalities announced a change in policy. As a result of that change, women from Northern Ireland can now access free abortion care in England and those on a low income can also claim travel expenses for themselves and a companion. QUESTION tO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation Article 14 of the Convention taken in conjunction with Article 8? APPENDIX       A is a British national who was born in 1996, lives in Newry and is represented by Simpson Millar LLP     B is a British national who was born on 3 May 1974, lives in Newry and is represented by Simpson Millar LLP  Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
- Date
- 15 janvier 2019
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:001-189928
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral
- Résumé officiel