CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 6 février 2019

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA6BC7FA7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:right } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .sD3B63DAD { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s25B97BCD { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border:0.75pt solid #808080; border-collapse:collapse } .sF5C9E8B1 { height:46.3pt } .sD1CDDC62 { border-right:0.75pt solid #808080; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #808080; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#e0e0e0 } .sB217F55D { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify; font-size:8pt } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s2490CDBC { border-right:0.75pt solid #808080; border-left:0.75pt solid #808080; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #808080; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#e0e0e0 } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sECE322C2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:1.65pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .s8DB21C27 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .s26ADB50A { border-left:0.75pt solid #808080; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #808080; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#e0e0e0 } .sD257B167 { height:117.8pt } .s2F4AF114 { border-top:0.75pt solid #808080; border-right:0.75pt solid #808080; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #808080; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s6CF83D49 { margin-left:11.67pt; padding-left:6.18pt; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; font-weight:bold } .s898DAE93 { border:0.75pt solid #808080; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s5FFF0A7E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:8pt } .sB71F2881 { border-top:0.75pt solid #808080; border-left:0.75pt solid #808080; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #808080; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sFD306575 { height:35.55pt } .sBCA334AF { border-top:0.75pt solid #808080; border-right:0.75pt solid #808080; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s7CB6920E { border-top:0.75pt solid #808080; border-right:0.75pt solid #808080; border-left:0.75pt solid #808080; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s62945D10 { border-top:0.75pt solid #808080; border-left:0.75pt solid #808080; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top }   Communicated on 6 February 2019   THIRD SECTION Application no. 59131/10 Sergey Fedorovich KARKARIN against Russia and 3 other applications (see list appended) The applicants’ personal details are set out in the appended table. They have all obtained final judgments in their favour, according to which different state authorities were ordered to pay them certain sums. These court decisions were enforced with a significant delay or remained unenforced. The applicants sought compensation for delayed enforcement or non-enforcement under the Compensation Act. The respective information about the judgments in the applicants’ favour and their enforcement, courts decisions concerning the compensation awards and respective sums are indicated in the appended table. COMPLAINTS The applicants complain about the insufficiency of the amounts awarded as compensation for the lengthy non-enforcement of the judgments in their favour or refusal to grant such compensation. In application no. 42267/15 the applicant complains about non-enforcement of the final judgment in his favour and refusal to grant compensation for non-enforcement. In application no. 59131/10 the applicant also complains that he was not summoned to the hearing at the cassation instance. QUESTIONS to the parties 1.     Has there been a violation of Article 6   §   1 of the Convention in application no.   59131/10 on account of the Belgorod Regional Court’s failure to inform the applicant about the hearing at the cassation instance? 2.     Have there been violations of Article 6 of the Convention and Article   1 of Protocol No. 1 on account of the lengthy enforcement or non ‑ enforcement of the judgments in the applicants’ favour? 3.     Having regard to the proceedings instituted by the applicants under the Law no. 68-FZ of 30 April 2010, “On Compensation for Violation of the Right to a Trial within a Reasonable Time or the Right to Enforcement of a Judgment within a Reasonable Time” (“the Compensation Act”), did the applicants have an effective domestic remedy for the lengthy enforcement or non-enforcement of the final judgments, as required by Article 13 of the Convention?   APPENDIX No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant name Date of birth Place of residence Nationality Represented by Final domestic decision details (in Russian roubles (RUB)) Length of enforcement proceedings Compensation for delayed enforcement or refusal (in RUB) Other complaints Amount Friendly Settlement (in euros (EUR))   59131/10 10/09/2010 Sergey Fedorovich KARKARIN 26/01/1956 Staryy Oskol Russian 1)   Starooskolk Town Court 20/11/2002 RUB   5,369.21 (arrears) + RUB   1,483.04 (monthly payments)   2)   Starooskolk Town Court 27/05/2004 RUB 794.88 + RUB 1,681.76   3)   Starooskolk Town Court 25/10/2005 RUB 1,076.32 + RUB 1,816.30 1)   1 year and 6 months         2)   1 year and 6 months       3)   1 year and 1 month Belgorod Regional Court 27/04/2010 RUB 10,000   Enforced on 22/07/2010 A6-was not informed about the hearing at the Belgorod Regional Court (cassation instance) EUR 2,300   60265/11 18/07/2011 Aleksandr Yuryevich KOVALKOV 06/07/1960 Moscou Russian 1)   Ryazansk Garrison Court 12/12/2008 RUB 10,922 – monthly payments for three months of 2008 (specified by the decision of 22/01/2010)   2)   Ryazansk Garrison Court 18/03/2009 RUB 11,232 – monthly payments for three months of 2008-2009 (specified by the decision of 22/01/2010) 1)   5 years, 1 month and 22 days           2)   4 years, 11 months and 18   days Moscow Regional Military Court 29/12/2010 RUB 5,000 for each judgment   Remained unenforced   EUR 10,100   42267/15 05/08/2015 Ivan Ivanovich PALIY 17/11/1949 Sadovy Russian   Tatyana Igorevna SLADKOVA Leninskiy District Court of Rostov-na-Donu 17/08/2011 17/10/2011 RUB 300,000 (compensation for non-pecuniary damage due to the applicant’s son demise) Non-enforced Rostov Regional Court 03/03/2015 9/12/2015 Rejected   EUR 7,100   76882/16 26/11/2016 Andrey Igorevich RESIN 29/07/1974 Khabarovsk Russian   Tatyana Robertovna YESINA Kirov District Court 25/11/2011 RUB 10,200 (Compensation for non ‑ pecuniary damage, costs and expenses) 3 years, 1 month and 19 days Khabarovsk Regional Court 15/10/2015 22/07/2016 RUB 5,000   Enforced   EUR 2,700