CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG — 14 mars 2019

.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .sCF71F55 { width:100%; border-collapse:collapse } .s829ABBD9 { border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-top:11.35pt; padding-bottom:10.98pt; vertical-align:middle } .s598389FB { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:14pt } .sDB9EB187 { font-weight:bold } .s598389F8 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:11pt } .sFBC99493 { font-style:italic } .s2D33099A { font-size:7.33pt; font-style:italic; vertical-align:super } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sE3D66594 { border:0.75pt solid #000000; border-collapse:collapse } .s41E9DBF5 { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s5FFF0A7F { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:9pt } .s24AC208E { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sF004B676 { border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sB30C44B0 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sC3AB69A { border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s2342A031 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s546C9D04 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s40B7A780 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s4F2EDFF { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s22F01CEB { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-18pt } .s37D58556 { width:14.67pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s98CF51EF { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:56.7pt; margin-bottom:0pt } Resolution CM/ResDH(2019)58 Execution of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights Twenty cases against Russian Federation   (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 14 March 2019 at the 1340 th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies)     Application No. Case Judgment of Final on 52805/10 ABIDOV 12/06/2012 12/09/2012 35692/11 ALIKHONOV 31/07/2012 31/10/2012 30225/11 BAKOYEV 05/02/2013 05/05/2013 38124/07 DZHURAYEV 17/12/2009 28/06/2010 66317/09 ELMURATOV 03/03/2011 15/09/2011 42443/02 EMINBEYLI 26/02/2009 26/05/2009 19316/09 GALEYEV 03/06/2010 03/09/2010 69235/11 K. 23/05/2013 23/08/2013 13476/04 KHUDYAKOVA 08/01/2009 08/04/2009 19732/04 KONONTSEV 29/07/2010 29/10/2010 70440/10 KOSHEVOY 13/06/2017 13/09/2017 60045/10 KOZHAYEV 05/06/2012 22/10/2012 77658/11 LATIPOV 12/12/2013 12/03/2014 656/06 NASRULLOYEV 11/10/2007 11/01/2008 27843/11 NIYAZOV 16/10/2012 16/01/2013 44882/07 NOVOSELOV 02/06/2005 10/01/2017 56662/09 OSHLAKOV 03/04/2014 03/07/2014 55822/10 SHAKUROV 05/06/2012 22/10/2012 16074/07 SHCHEBET 12/06/2008 12/09/2008 41970/11 SHCHERBINA 26/06/2014 17/11/2014   The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”),   Having regard to the final judgments transmitted by the Court to the Committee in these cases and to the violations established mainly on account of various irregularities concerning detention pending extradition (violations of Article 5 of the Convention);   Having regard also to the violations established in some of these cases related to poor conditions of detention on remand and in police custody, as well as inadequate medical treatment on remand (violations of Articles 3 of the Convention);   Recalling the respondent State’s obligation, under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention, to abide by all final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and that this obligation entails, over and above the payment of any sums awarded by the Court, the adoption by the authorities of the respondent State, where required:   -           of individual measures to put an end to violations established and erase their consequences so as to achieve as far as possible restitutio in integrum ; and -           of general measures preventing similar violations;   Having invited the government of the respondent State to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with the above-mentioned obligation;   Having noted the information provided regarding the payment of the just satisfaction awarded by the Court;   Considering that the question of individual measures was resolved, given that the applicants are no longer detained pending extradition, on remand or in police custody;   Recalling that the question of the general measures required in response to the shortcomings found by the Court in these judgments continues to be examined within the framework of the Garabayev v. Russian Federation group of cases and that the closure of these cases therefore in no way prejudges the Committee’s evaluation of the general measures required;   Recalling also that the general measures required in response to the other violations found in some of these cases are examined by the Committee in the Kalashnikov group of cases;   DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in these cases as regards the individual measures and   DECIDES to close the examination thereof.