CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 5 avril 2019

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA6BC7FA7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:right } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase }   Communicated on 8 October 2015 and 5 April 2019   FIRST SECTION Application no. 56898/13 Ivančica ZOVKO against Croatia lodged on 27 August 2013   The facts and complaints in this application have been summarised in the Court’s Statement of facts and Questions to the parties, which is available in HUDOC. QUESTIONS Did the applicant have a fair hearing in the determination of her civil rights, in accordance with Article 6 § 1 of the Convention? In particular, did she have an effective opportunity to participate in the proceedings concerning her request that further diagnoses of her medical condition be recognized as work-related injuries and that she be awarded the related health insurance benefits, as well as in the proceedings by which her sick ‑ leave payment was terminated on 4 March 2011, and was the principle of equality of arms respected with regard to the commissioning and obtaining of the relevant expert reports?