CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG — 6 juin 2019

.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .sCF71F55 { width:100%; border-collapse:collapse } .s829ABBD9 { border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-top:11.35pt; padding-bottom:10.98pt; vertical-align:middle } .s598389FB { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:14pt } .sDB9EB187 { font-weight:bold } .s598389F8 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:11pt } .sFBC99493 { font-style:italic } .s2D33099A { font-size:7.33pt; font-style:italic; vertical-align:super } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sE3D66594 { border:0.75pt solid #000000; border-collapse:collapse } .s41E9DBF5 { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s2EB42ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:10pt } .s161F193C { font-size:9pt; font-weight:bold } .s24AC208E { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s5FFF0A7F { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:9pt } .sF004B676 { border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sB30C44B0 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sC3AB69A { border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s2342A031 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s602396FA { font-size:9pt; color:#000000 } .s546C9D04 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s40B7A780 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s4F2EDFF { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s9D083258 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:56.7pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-21.25pt } .sA40F326F { width:17.92pt; text-indent:0pt; display:inline-block } .s876D4AB2 { text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } .s5A722CD { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:35.45pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s63D113AA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:35.45pt } Resolution CM/ResDH(2019)144 Execution of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights 23 cases against Republic of Moldova   (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 6 June 2019 at the 1348 th meeting of the Ministers' Deputies)     Application No. Case Judgment of Final on 59474/11 BALAKIN 26/01/2016 26/04/2016 23755/07 BUZADJI 05/07/2016 Grand Chamber 23393/05 CASTRAVET 13/03/2007 13/06/2007 72238/14 COTEȚ 23/10/2018 23/10/2018 7753/13 CUCU AND OTHERS 10/07/2018   10/07/2018   55792/08 FERARU 24/01/2012 24/04/2012 20289/02 GUŢU 07/06/2007 07/09/2007 36988/07 IGNATENCO 08/02/2011 08/05/2011 13150/11 IURCOVSCHI AND OTHERS 10/07/2018   10/07/2018   50717/09 LEVINTA No. 2 17/01/2012 17/04/2012 43038/13 MĂTĂSARU AND SAVIȚCHI 10/07/2018 10/07/2018 14437/05 MODARCA 10/05/2007 10/08/2007 47306/07 NINESCU 15/07/2014 15/10/2014 50473/11 PAȘA 15/05/2018 15/05/2018   1649/12 RIMSCHI 13/01/2015 13/04/2015 20546/16 SECRIERU 23/10/2018 23/10/2018 52053/15 SIRENCO 15/01/2019 15/01/2019 35324/04 STICI 23/10/2007 23/01/2008 4834/06 STRAISTEANU AND OTHERS 07/04/2009 24/04/2012 07/07/2009 24/09/2012 34382/07 TRIPĂDUŞ 22/04/2014 22/07/2014 39835/05 TURCAN AND TURCAN 23/10/2007 23/01/2008 679/13 VERETCO 07/04/2015 07/07/2015 3817/05 URSU 27/11/2007 27/02/2008   The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”,   Having regard to the final judgments transmitted by the Court to the Committee in these cases and to the violations established mainly on account of the lack of relevant and sufficient reasoning of detention orders, lengthy examination of the lawfulness of detention, refusals by the domestic courts to allow the applicants access to the case files and to hear evidence from defence, and the lack of remedy to obtain compensation in respect of unlawful detention or insufficient amount of compensation (violations of Articles 5);   Recalling the respondent State’s obligation, under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention, to abide by all final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and that this obligation entails, over and above the payment of any sums awarded by the Court, the adoption by the authorities of the respondent State, where required:   -   of individual measures to put an end to violations established and erase their consequences so as to achieve as far as possible restitutio in integrum ; and -   of general measures preventing similar violations;   Having invited the government of the respondent State to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with the above-mentioned obligation;   Having examined the information provided by the government indicating the individual measures adopted in order to give effect to the judgments including the information provided regarding the payment of the just satisfaction awarded by the Court (see documents DH-DD(2014)232 , DH-DD(2014)1147 , DH-DD(2015)1057 , DH-DD(2017)736 , DH-DD(2018)353 , DH-DD(2019)433 );   Considering that the question of individual measures has been resolved, given that the just satisfaction has been paid and that none of the applicants is detained pending trial, and given that all necessary individual measures have also been taken in respect of other violations found by the Court;   Considering further the general measures adopted to address violations of Article 5 § 1 on account of insufficient compensation awarded by the domestic courts, Article 11, and Article 13 in conjunction with Article 8, which appear capable of preventing similar violations from occurring in the future;   Recalling that the question of the outstanding general measures required in response to the shortcomings found by the Court in the present judgments continues to be examined within the framework of the Sarban group (Application No. 3456/05) and that the closure of these cases therefore in no way prejudges the Committee’s evaluation of the general measures required in relation to the violations of the applicants’ rights to liberty and security;   DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in these cases as regards the individual measures and   DECIDES to close the examination of these cases.