CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 17 juin 2019

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sA6BC7FA7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } Communicated on 17 June 2019   SECOND SECTION Application no. 39769/17 K.F. and A.F. against Norway lodged on 26 May 2017 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the domestic authorities’ decision to remove their parental responsibilities in respect of their daughter, X, authorise that X be adopted by her foster parents, and rule out further contact between the applicants and X. Under Article 8 the applicants complain of a violation of their right to respect for their family life. QUESTION tO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicants’ right to respect for their family life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention, through the authorities’ decision to remove their parental responsibilities in respect of their daughter, to authorise that the latter be adopted by her foster parents, and to rule out contact with their daughter (see, for example, S.S. v. Slovenia , no.   40938/16, 30 October 2018; S.H. v. Italy , no. 52557/14, 13 October 2015; Pontes v. Portugal , no. 19554/09, 10 April 2012; and Aune v.   Norway , no.   52502/07, 28 October 2010)?