CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 17 juin 2019

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA6BC7FA7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:right } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic }   Communicated on 17 June 2019   SECOND SECTION Application no. 63295/17 O.S. against Norway lodged on 18 August 2017 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns domestic proceedings in which the applicant’s two daughters were placed in public care and the applicant was granted contact rights of four hours, four times per year. The applicant complains under Article 8 of the Convention that the above entailed an unnecessary interference with her right to respect for family life. QUESTIONS tO THE PARTIES Has there been an interference with the applicant’s right to respect for her family life under Article 8 § 1 of the Convention? If yes, was the interference in accordance with the law and necessary under the second paragraph of that provision? (See, inter alia , K. and T. v. Finland [GC], no.   25702/94, ECHR 2001 ‑ VII.)