CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 17 juin 2019

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA6BC7FA7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:right } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic }   Communicated on 17 June 2019   SECOND SECTION Application no. 29958/11 I.M. against the Republic of Moldova lodged on 20 April 2011 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns disclosure of sensitive personal medical information about the applicant to an unauthorised State agent, who in turn forwarded it to a private person. It raises an issue under Article 8 of the Convention. QUESTION tO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of Article 8 of the Convention in the present case owing to the disclosure of sensitive personal medical information about the applicant to an unauthorised State agent, and its forwarding to a private person? Can the applicant still claim to be a victim of such a violation in spite of the judgment in his favour and the sum awarded to him (see Z. v.   Finland , no. 22009/93, §§ 60-114, 25 February 1997)?