CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 6 septembre 2019

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA6BC7FA7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:right } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic }   Communicated on 6 September 2019   SECOND SECTION Application no. 46371/18 Olav OMDAHL against Norway lodged on 21 September 2018 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the public administration of the applicant’s grandfather’s estate, which began on 5 May 1993 and ended with the City Court’s decision 10 August 2015. The applicant complains under Article 6 about the length of the proceedings. QUESTION tO THE PARTIES Was the length of the proceedings in breach of the “reasonable time” requirement of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (see, for example, Oliveira Modesto and Others v. Portugal , no. 68445/10, 29 January 2019; and Berlin v. Luxembourg , no. 44978/98, 15 July 2003)?