CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 10 septembre 2019

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .sA035ED55 { width:94.24%; margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s88148036 { width:7.98%; border-top:0.75pt solid #5f5f5f; border-right:0.75pt solid #f8f8f8; border-left:0.75pt solid #5f5f5f; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #5f5f5f; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#5f5f5f } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .s3FAB130A { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#f8f8f8 } .sF4DB1D42 { width:28.22%; border-top:0.75pt solid #5f5f5f; border-right:0.75pt solid #f8f8f8; border-left:0.75pt solid #f8f8f8; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #5f5f5f; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#5f5f5f } .s16294F28 { width:17.98%; border-top:0.75pt solid #5f5f5f; border-right:0.75pt solid #f8f8f8; border-left:0.75pt solid #f8f8f8; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #5f5f5f; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#5f5f5f } .sA291986F { width:19.1%; border-top:0.75pt solid #5f5f5f; border-right:0.75pt solid #f8f8f8; border-left:0.75pt solid #f8f8f8; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #5f5f5f; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#5f5f5f } .s37B1D065 { width:26.72%; border-top:0.75pt solid #5f5f5f; border-right:0.75pt solid #5f5f5f; border-left:0.75pt solid #f8f8f8; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #5f5f5f; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#5f5f5f } .sE9034F1F { width:7.98%; border:0.75pt solid #5f5f5f; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sBFCEE06F { width:28.22%; border:0.75pt solid #5f5f5f; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s2C22D3D8 { width:17.98%; border:0.75pt solid #5f5f5f; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sCDB4354D { width:19.1%; border:0.75pt solid #5f5f5f; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s969B18E { width:26.72%; border:0.75pt solid #5f5f5f; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s87D75CD { width:7.98%; border:0.75pt solid #0072bc; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#e8e8e8 } .s9B940273 { width:28.22%; border:0.75pt solid #0072bc; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#e8e8e8 } .s96CA2272 { width:17.98%; border:0.75pt solid #0072bc; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#e8e8e8 } .s972807E8 { width:19.1%; border:0.75pt solid #0072bc; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#e8e8e8 } .s3B7E9051 { width:26.72%; border:0.75pt solid #0072bc; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#e8e8e8 } Communicated on 10 September 2019   FIRST SECTION Application no. 36423/16 Esraa AL BEID and others against Greece lodged on 14 July 2016 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the living conditions of the applicants, all Syrian nationals, in the EKO camp, and the shortcomings in the asylum procedure. QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1.     Having regard to the applicants’ situation (mostly families with minor children and adults who face various health issues), were their living conditions in EKO camp compatible with the requirements of Article 3 of the Convention?   2.     Having regard to the applicants’ allegations that they were not able to access the asylum procedures despite their repeated attempts and thus they would face the risk of being returned to Syria without an examination of the merits of their allegations under Article 3 of the Convention, was the procedure afforded to the applicants as asylum seekers, after their arrival in Greece, compatible with Article 3 of the Convention, taken in conjunction with Article 13? APPENDIX   No. Applicant’s Name Birth date Nationality Place of residence 1 Esraa AL BEID 29/01/1979 Syrian Athens 2 Abdullah ABDULKARIM 11/09/1958 Syrian Athens 3 Ghazal AL GHARIB 18/01/2001 Syrian Thessaloniki 4 Ghina AL GHARIB 01/01/2005 Syrian Thessaloniki 5 Mayyar AL GHARIB 11/04/2005 Syrian Thessaloniki 6 Milad AL GHARIB 01/01/2014 Syrian Thessaloniki 7 Yazan AL GHARIB 21/06/1999 Syrian Thessaloniki 8 Rudayna ALNASER 05/07/1977 Syrian Thessaloniki 9 Ahmed ALYOUSEFF 01/01/1987 Syrian Kastoria 10 Mohammad ALYOUSEFF 10/09/1996 Syrian Thessaloniki 11 Al Gharib AYAD 01/01/1954 Syrian Thessaloniki 12 Ibrahem AYAN 15/12/1989 Syrian Thessaloniki 13 Talal HADRY 06/02/1980 Syrian Athens 14 Abdulaker JAAFAR 01/01/1954 Syrian Athens 15 Mohamed NOOR HADRY 13/03/2015 Syrian Athens 16 Abdullah SABOUNI 21/01/1994 Syrian Thessaloniki 17 Abdulaziz SHAHA 22/12/1960 Syrian Germany 18 Ahmad SHEIKO 01/01/1950 Syrian Germany 19 Deyar SHEIKO 14/05/1998 Syrian Germany 20 Rosa SHEIKO 09/03/1996 Syrian Germany