CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 19 septembre 2019

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .sB1AFDE2D { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left; font-size:14pt } .s598389F8 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:11pt } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .sC719ED01 { padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#5f5f5f } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .s3FAB130A { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#f8f8f8 } .s598389F9 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:12pt } .sC3AB69A { border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sC6521EB1 { padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#e8e8e8 } .s4E9FF9F2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:11pt } Communicated on 19 September 2019   FOURTH SECTION Application no. 65532/16 József KERTÉSZ against Hungary and 3 other applications (see appended table)   SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASES The applications concern the applicants’ conviction to life imprisonment and the fact that their mandatory pardon proceedings can take place only after having served forty years. Mr József Kertész was convicted by the Pécs Court of Appeal on 10     January 2014. Mr László Tóth was convicted by the Debrecen Court of Appeal on 20     May 2015. Mr Mihály Nagy was convicted by the Budapest Court of Appeal on 28     February 2017. Mr Róbert Tóth was convicted by the Debrecen Court of Appeal on 20     May 2015. QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Have the applicants been deprived of any real prospect of release and thus potentially subjected to inhuman punishment, in breach of Article 3 of the Convention, in view of the fact that they will not be eligible for the mandatory pardon proceedings before having served forty years of imprisonment (see T.P. and A.T. v. Hungary , nos.   37871/14   and   73986/14, 4   October 2016)?     APPENDIX   List of applications   No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Date of Birth   Represented by 1 65532/16 09/11/2016 József KERTÉSZ 08/02/1971   Erzsébet KADLÓT 2 17943/19 28/03/2019 László TÓTH 07/07/1987   Dániel András KARSAI 3 25908/19 07/05/2019 Mihály NAGY 17/09/1954   Dániel András KARSAI 4 25916/19 07/05/2019 Róbert TÓTH 13/06/1986   Dániel András KARSAI