CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 26 septembre 2019

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } Communicated on 26 September 2019   FOURTH SECTION Application no. 24678/17 Ernő DANYI against Hungary lodged on 23 March 2017 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the fairness of the applicant’s trial in which judges, previously involved in the investigation phase, participated. QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Having regard to the participation at the trial of judges involved in the investigation phase, was the criminal charge against the applicant decided by an “independent and impartial tribunal”, within the meaning of Article   6   §   1 of the Convention?