CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 24 septembre 2019

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .sD2EAB1C3 { width:57.2%; margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .sE75E1D31 { width:12.6%; border-top:0.75pt solid #5f5f5f; border-right:0.75pt solid #f8f8f8; border-left:0.75pt solid #5f5f5f; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #5f5f5f; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#5f5f5f } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .s3FAB130A { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#f8f8f8 } .s886D8256 { width:87.4%; border-top:0.75pt solid #5f5f5f; border-right:0.75pt solid #5f5f5f; border-left:0.75pt solid #f8f8f8; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #5f5f5f; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#5f5f5f } .s8DE70000 { width:12.6%; border:0.75pt solid #5f5f5f; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sB2B51256 { width:87.4%; border:0.75pt solid #5f5f5f; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sDD63230F { width:12.6%; border:0.75pt solid #0072bc; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#e8e8e8 } .sA72FB4B7 { width:87.4%; border:0.75pt solid #0072bc; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#e8e8e8 } Communicated on 19 March 2019 and 24 September 2019   THIRD SECTION Application no. 43229/18 Yuliya Sergeyevna YATSEVICH and Yaroslav Artemovich YATSEVICH against Russia lodged on 3 September 2018   The facts and complaints in this application have been summarised in the Court’s Statement of facts and Questions to the parties, which is available in HUDOC. QUESTIONS 1.     Did the judgment of the Vidnoye Town Court of the Moscow Region of 7 February 2019, as upheld on appeal on 26   August 2019, determining the second applicant’s place of residence as being with his father, violate the applicants’ right to respect for their family life, guaranteed by Article 8 of the Convention?   2.     Was the judgment in question prompted by the consequences of the authorities’ failure to enforce in due time the judgment of the Kuybyshevskiy District Court of St   Petersburg of 22   September 2016, upheld on appeal on 13   February 2017, granting the first applicant a residence order in respect of the second applicant?   APPENDIX   No. Applicant’s Name 1 Yuliya Sergeyevna YATSEVICH 2 Yaroslav Artemovich YATSEVICH