CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 22 octobre 2019

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } Communicated on 22 October 2019   FOURTH SECTION Application no. 15977/17 S.B. against Hungary lodged on 23 February 2017 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the alleged absence of legal basis for the detention of the applicant, a minor asylum-seeker from Pakistan, between 23   June and 23 August 2016. QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Was the applicant deprived of his liberty in breach of Article 5 § 1 of the Convention (see, mutatis mutandis , X.Y. v. Hungary , no. 43888/08, §§   11 and   28, 19 March 2013)? In particular, was the applicant’s detention between 23 June and 23 August 2016 maintained “in accordance with a procedure prescribed by law”?