CEDHCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 20 novembre 2019
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:001-199352
- Date
- 20 novembre 2019
- Publication
- 20 novembre 2019
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleCommunicated
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } Communicated on 20 November 2019   FIRST SECTION Application no. 52484/18 Nikolaos STAVROPOULOS and others against Greece lodged on 31 October 2018 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The third applicant is the daughter of the first two applicants. The application concerns the registration in the birth certificate of the forename of the third applicant, next to which it was noted that it was registered by “choice of given name” ( ονοματοδοσία ). The applicants argued that that note, which was not provided for by law and constituted a general practice of Registry Offices, constituted a violation of their right to freedom of religion, as the choice of given name is implicitly opposed to the name given by christening. They additionally argue that it reveals sensitive personal data, constituting a violation of Article 8 of the Convention. QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1.     Has there been a violation of the applicants’ right to freedom of religion as guaranteed by Article 9 of the Convention as a result of a note on the birth certificate of the third applicant indicating that her forename was registered “by choice of given name”?   2.     Has there been a violation of the applicants’ right to private life as guaranteed by Article 8 of the Convention on account of the above note next to the forename of the third applicant stating that it was registered by “choice of given name”?Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
- Date
- 20 novembre 2019
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:001-199352
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral
- Résumé officiel