CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG — 5 décembre 2019

.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .sCF71F55 { width:100%; border-collapse:collapse } .s829ABBD9 { border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-top:11.35pt; padding-bottom:10.98pt; vertical-align:middle } .s598389FB { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:14pt } .sDB9EB187 { font-weight:bold } .s598389F8 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:11pt } .sFBC99493 { font-style:italic } .s2D33099A { font-size:7.33pt; font-style:italic; vertical-align:super } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sE3D66594 { border:0.75pt solid #000000; border-collapse:collapse } .s41E9DBF5 { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s5FFF0A7F { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:9pt } .s24AC208E { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sF004B676 { border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sB30C44B0 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sC3AB69A { border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s2342A031 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s546C9D04 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s40B7A780 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s4F2EDFF { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s22F01CEB { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-18pt } .s37D58556 { width:14.67pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s876D4AB2 { text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } .sA8507A40 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:35.4pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s5A722CD { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:35.45pt; margin-bottom:0pt } Resolution CM/ResDH(2019)330 Execution of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights 22 cases against Turkey   (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 5 December 2019 at the 1362 nd meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies)     Application No. Case Judgment of Final on 37569/06 BAYAR AND GÜRBÜZ 27/11/2012 27/05/2013 16624/12 AYDEMİR AND KARAVİL 09/10/2018 09/10/2018 39690/06 BAYAR No. 1 25/03/2014 25/06/2014 40559/06 BAYAR No. 2 25/03/2014 25/06/2014 48815/06 BAYAR No. 3 25/03/2014 25/06/2014 2512/07 BAYAR No. 4 25/03/2014 25/06/2014 55197/07 BAYAR No. 5 25/03/2014 25/06/2014 55199/07 BAYAR No. 6 25/03/2014 25/06/2014 55201/07 BAYAR No. 7 25/03/2014 25/06/2014 55202/07 BAYAR No. 8 25/03/2014 25/06/2014 33037/07 BAYAR AND GÜRBÜZ (No. 2) 03/02/2015 03/05/2015 10758/09 BELEK AND ÖZKURT 13/02/2018 13/02/2018 28470/08 BELEK AND ÖZKURT (No. 2) 17/06/2014 17/09/2014 28516/08 BELEK AND ÖZKURT (No. 3) 17/06/2014 17/09/2014 4323/09 BELEK AND ÖZKURT (No. 4) 17/06/2014 17/09/2014 4327/09 BELEK AND ÖZKURT (No. 5) 17/06/2014 17/09/2014 4375/09 BELEK AND ÖZKURT (No. 6) 17/06/2014 17/09/2014 10752/09 BELEK AND ÖZKURT (No. 7) 17/06/2014 17/09/2014 25834/09 ÇELİK 04/09/2018 04/09/2018 25764/09+ YALÇINKAYA AND OTHERS 01/10/2013 09/02/2016 01/01/2014 09/02/2016 55828/08 AYDOĞAN 27/02/2018 27/02/2018 51497/09 MÜSLÜM YALÇINKAYA AND OTHERS 16/01/2018 16/01/2018   The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”),   Having regard to the final judgments transmitted by the Court to the Committee in these cases and to the violations established;   Recalling that the violations of the Convention found by the Court in these cases primarily concern the violation of the right to access to court on account of inadmissibility of the applicant’s appeal on points of law on grounds that level of fine was below statutory minimum for appeal (violations of Article 6); other violations concern:   -           the applicants’ convictions under Anti-Terrorism Law for having expressed opinions that did not incite hatred or violence (violations of Article 10) (this issue is being examined under the Öner and Türk (51962/12) group of cases); -           lack of adequate reasoning in domestic court decisions in the case of Yalcinkaya and Others (25764/09) (violation of Article 6) (this issue is being examined under the Asan (28582/02) case);   Recalling the respondent State’s obligation, under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention, to abide by all final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and that this obligation entails, over and above the payment of any sums awarded by the Court, the adoption by the authorities of the respondent State, where required:   -           of individual measures to put an end to violations established and erase their consequences so as to achieve as far as possible restitutio in integrum ; and -           of general measures preventing similar violations;   Having invited the government of the respondent State to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with the above-mentioned obligation;   Having examined the action report provided by the government indicating the measures adopted to give effect to the judgments, in particular the amendment to Article 272, paragraph 3, of the new Code on Criminal Procedure (No.   5271), and also the information provided regarding the payment of the just satisfaction awarded by the Court (see document DH- DH-DD(2019)1323 );   Having satisfied itself that all the measures required by Article 46, paragraph 1, have been adopted,   DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in these cases and   DECIDES to close the examination thereof.