CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG — 15 janvier 2020

.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .sCF71F55 { width:100%; border-collapse:collapse } .s829ABBD9 { border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-top:11.35pt; padding-bottom:10.98pt; vertical-align:middle } .s598389FB { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:14pt } .sDB9EB187 { font-weight:bold } .s598389F8 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:11pt } .sFBC99493 { font-style:italic } .s2D33099A { font-size:7.33pt; font-style:italic; vertical-align:super } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sE3D66594 { border:0.75pt solid #000000; border-collapse:collapse } .sD81AB0A7 { height:11.35pt } .s41E9DBF5 { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s5FFF0A7F { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:9pt } .s24AC208E { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sF004B676 { border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sB30C44B0 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sC3AB69A { border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s2342A031 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s546C9D04 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s40B7A780 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s4F2EDFF { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sA8507A40 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:35.4pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s5A722CD { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:35.45pt; margin-bottom:0pt } Resolution CM/ResDH(2020)6 Execution of the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights 31 cases against Turkey   (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 15 January 2020 at the 1364 th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies)     Application No. Case Date of the decision 12278/09 Sadun ÇİĞDEM 02/04/2019 12820/17 Dilşah DOĞAN 21/03/2019 19434/10 Murat ASLAN 02/04/2019 21126/15 İlhan CİHANER 30/04/2019 21715/10 Misbah SAYAN 02/04/2019 2281/10 Abdulcebbar KIRTAY 19/03/2019 29114/09 Ekrem KILAVUZ 02/04/2019 30496/09 Hayrettin ŞAYIK 02/04/2019 30841/10 Fahri ARCAGÖK 02/04/2019 32841/09 İskender TUTAR 28/05/2019 32848/09 İbrahim GÜRCEĞIZ 02/04/2019 35671/09 Berrin BEK 11/06/2019 35814/09 Sedat ŞERAN 28/05/2019 35818/09 Mustafa BOZKURT 02/04/2019 35819/09 Şevket AKTAŞ 02/04/2019 35839/09 Mecit DAMAR 28/05/2019 36307/09 Cüneyt GENÇERİ 30/04/2019 36691/09 Bilal ÇETİNER 02/04/2019 38006/15 Mehmet ALKAN 19/03/2019 38909/07 Rıdvan KIZĞIN 02/04/2019 45008/08 Naşit TUTAR 02/04/2019 49005/09 Abdullah YALÇIN 30/04/2019 52120/08 Hasan SÜSLİ 02/04/2019 5415/08 Mehmet Emin SABAZ 19/03/2019 54172/08 Murat SALUR 02/04/2019 54185/08 Asif GÜNEŞ 02/04/2019 56281/08 Mesut TUNCE 02/04/2019 61718/08 Zekeriya ŞENGÖZ 02/04/2019 62450/11 R.M. 02/04/2019 74119/14 Şerife ERSOY 11/06/2019 78671/14 Durmuş GÖKNAR AND 5 OTHER APPLICATIONS 11/06/2019   The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 39, paragraph 4, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of friendly settlements as they appear in the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”),   Considering that in these cases the Court, having taken formal note of the friendly settlements reached by the government of the respondent State and the applicants and having been satisfied that the settlements were based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention or its Protocols, decided to strike these cases from its list;   Having satisfied itself that the terms of the friendly settlements were executed by the government of the respondent State,   DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 39, paragraph 4, of the Convention and   DECIDES to close their examination.