CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 16 janvier 2020

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sA1B5EE21 { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:24.7pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:-10.5pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s58699FB5 { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } Communicated on 16 January 2020 Published on 3 February 2020   THIRD SECTION Applications nos. 75328/16 and 3121/18 Sergey Viktorovich ZHIGAYEV against Russia and Ivan Alekseyevich PUGIN against Russia lodged on 26 November 2016 and 5 December 2017 respectively STATEMENT OF FACTS The applicant in the first case, Mr Sergey Viktorovich Zhigayev, is a Russian national, who was born in 1961 and lives in Moscow. He is represented before the Court by Mr I. Potapov, a lawyer practising in Moscow. The applicant in the second case, Mr Ivan Alekseyevich Pugin, is a Russian national, who was born in 1988 and lives in Arkhangelsk. The circumstances of the cases The facts of the cases, as submitted by the applicants, may be summarised as follows. The applicants were found liable for an administrative offence of drunk driving. The court imposed on them a monetary fine in the amount of 30,000 Russian roubles and suspended temporarily their driving licenses. The details pertaining to each application are summed up in the Appendix below. COMPLAINTS The applicants complain under Article 6   §   1 of the Convention that the courts which considered their cases were not impartial. QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Were the courts which dealt with the applicants’ cases impartial, as required by Article   6   §   1 of the Convention (see Karelin v. Russia , no.   926/08, §§   38-85, 20 September 2016)?